alli s mtengeti vs jonas asseri 2006 tzhc 316 5 may 2006
Section 19(3) of the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 applies to appeals under the Magistrates’ Courts Act, 1984, so the time taken to obtain a copy of the judgment must be excluded when computing the limitation period. The appeal was filed within time as only 13 days elapsed after the appellant received the judgment copy.
- Citation
- alli s mtengeti vs jonas asseri 2006 tzhc 316 5 may 2006
- Parties
- Appellant: Alli S. Mtengeti; Respondent: Jonas Asseri
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Computation of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alli S. Mtengeti
Appellant
Jonas Asseri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is time barred under Section 25(1) and (3) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act, 1984
- 2 Whether time taken to obtain a copy of judgment should be excluded in computing the limitation period for appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Section 19(3) of the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 applies to appeals under the Magistrates’ Courts Act, 1984, so the time taken to obtain a copy of the judgment must be excluded when computing the limitation period. The appeal was filed within time as only 13 days elapsed after the appellant received the judgment copy.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- Preliminary objection dismissed with costs.
- Appeal to be heard on merits on a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment