19881226 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
The appellant was found in recent possession of stolen property and sold it soon after it was missing from the Health Centre, justifying conviction for stealing by a person employed in public service. The sentence was not excessive.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881226 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Parties
- Appellant: Ally Bajadjuani; Respondent: The United Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stealing by Employee, Public Service, Store Breaking
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ally Bajadjuani
Appellant
The United Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for stealing by a person employed in public service was proper
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
- 3 Whether the accused should have been charged with store breaking and stealing
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was found in recent possession of stolen property and sold it soon after it was missing from the Health Centre, justifying conviction for stealing by a person employed in public service. The sentence was not excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
DI = lllGIJ c= OF T4N'ZA!IIA.. _ . AT Dlill ES SALAAM tt. Lo -c1 ½ c~'w-h- ., . APPELLATE JllllISDICTICW _ .~ ~ man COORT CRI?UNAl, Al'PEAL N0.66 OF 1900·' (J'rca ~ ,.., Or:Jo~nal Ca.so lfo.7 of 1908 of tba Diatri.ot Coa:ri of Xisa.rawo ... Distr:t.ot a, ld.sara,o) . I ALLY BAJ.JADlJAnl•. •. • ••• • • , , • • • ,. • • ••• , .; • •• , , • • • • • , ••• • • • • ,. ••••••• ". APPllLWT ( ~ginal. .Aaousocl) TS W:t'l'EI> nm>DLIC.. • .. • •••• • •. , •. , , • • • • • • • •" ••••••••• • ••••••••••RESPOlIDENr . . ( Or.iginalL ;~OSG~ ~ xwmo. it 1'he appellant uas conviotod. in tho District Court of Kisa.ra.wo D.tatr.iot, at IC:is8.'.L'aHo1 of stGaling by a porson employee, in tho pu.blic 1orvioe oontra.t-y to sootio11S 270 and 265 of tho Penal Cod&. IIo was cbargod. as tho thi:rd a.caused aoong four a.oousod persons, tb.a others ltoro aoqui ttGd and ho uaa sontonood to f ou:r yea.rs t imprisonnon:t following tho, oonviots.on. lio is appoa.lii)g· now against t.."1.o oonviotion am. tho · aontonoo. I thitlk tho a!)poal is hopoloas. Tho appol1.ant was a.n roployoe of. _ . Kisiju Heal.th Centro Kisa:rowe Diatriot,. Ilo was a, cook. In tho oor:¢.ng. : on 11/5/37 the door of a'_storo of tho IIealth, Cent:r.o-'was found open. ~e koya for it wcro with Ilosco. Mtcka uho WM ·tho second a.oouecd a.t tho trial · azld. uas ao.Ol'.lg ~ -~uero a.Qqiltted. La.tar on oheok:i.ng one bag of r.Loo, . · ·.· one bag of sugar ~ o. bioyole,- all belonging to the IIoalth Oontro, woro.· fo,,md mi.a~ Report.a wore tUldo to tho relavnn1r ant11ori t:Loa. Soootirao lator,tho appellant sold tho bioyolo -tlo·-o. looo.J. bw3illcascmu., IIo.misi Abla.lloh (M), Ito~ it for 1200/-:- il'.u.on he(tb.o appellant) was .to delivor tho bioyol.o to Rn, b.e .(PUl) we.a r::;.-r~ to a. r;iosquo for proyo:rs• IIo found his wifo. M-raju:ln. J:I;:.ssa.ni (~r2). ·no (the appcllont) loft tho' · bioyolo with P\"l2. Later vhon nows that tho bicyolo ·had boon stol-an frOlll tho IIoal.th Contro rooohod. F'!-71 ho handod it book to tho o.ppallnnt. . . . to In his dofonoo the o.ppollnnt d,onicd that ho· sold tho b:Loyolojlm. or that he broke into tho storo and. atolo it and tho other i ~ oontionod: abovo• IIc has ru.inta.incd this defonoo on appoal to this Court,. 'lho lom-ned triol. oagistr?.to had no cli.ffioulV in disnissod. this cl.ofonoo~· I find that ·he (tho lom-noo. ~~strata) w~ justifiod in rojootitlg o.pp°': :. llant1s dofon.ce. Thora is noro than ovort·rh~ ov:i.d.onoo thAt tho 1 . appellant sold the Ccntrc•s bicycle to PW!. not l ~ o.ftar it vras found ·'' nissing froo .• tho Contra~ As t.11o loo.mod nagistro.to obsorvoo'.; he did . not'• .....:i....;---.. ........ ---- '~---:. ....._. ~ cn:pl~~{ii6~1'-h<i~~~-it 'boforo-~hEkSO~~:.-~:tho ~~ of'o.•~et - .-.:.. .. ~ , • • ....le • ' :I' . ~ ~- .,, . ' . ~ ~ W::' • ~ •• • .J"'. ..i,.... - of recent- po:siiossi.o:t.1.!c .i.S th-0 - ono who .~:~milo~o 1:J~ -~ tnll'.Q.o. the ~. • • . •- •. - ,, ·- .. ·~ • • . ... ••. • ·- ..... - .-:, . '!' ~ .. • • \ -~ . .. :, - 2 ._- bicycle and tho bags a£ rioe llnCl.. sugo.r,..· .rte. WM thore-foxo ri@-1 tly . . ' ',. ., convictoo.. '!ho sontcnoo lio on.mod was 11ot axoossive o.tJ4 I harol::(r ; qon:firo it.- As I havo·said tho appeal is a hopoloss 0110 aria. l disoiss . ' ::tt in its ontiro_ty~ .. Thero is ono rmttor I shoul.U point out boforo concluding howover. Tho bi.cycle and bags of Sligar woro stolo11 a.ftor a broaldng at tho s·toro 9.,£ tho 1Ioalth Con~• This l?eing tho case I an of tho view .tmt tho · ~cusod should ha.Jo boo11 clmrgod with storo brooking and stoo:J.ing undor section 296(1) of tho Ponai Codo. IIowovor, I soo no substc1ntinl hn.ro - to have boon ocoassionod to tho accused by boi.ng cha.rgodwith stealing ~ a person orip1oyod. in the public sorvioe.. I loavo tho oattor un:dis.... turbod thoroforoa DAR ES SALAAM. 28/12/1900~ /Y {~Jj(h. d4 . L.1.... r..fiM:iiJo JUDGE,