ally haji vs republic 2015 tzca 335 20 july 2015
The applicant's grounds do not satisfy the specific benchmarks for review under Rule 66(1); the application is a disguised re-hearing and lacks merit.
- Citation
- ally haji vs republic 2015 tzca 335 20 july 2015
- Parties
- Applicant: Ally Haji; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Appellate Decisions, Grounds for Review, Jurisdiction of Appellate Court
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ally Haji
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grounds raised by the applicant meet the requirements for review under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's grounds do not satisfy the specific benchmarks for review under Rule 66(1); the application is a disguised re-hearing and lacks merit.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review is dismissed for lack of merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment