19870723 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The disputed area was a plot belonging to the appellants, not a path or entrance. The appellants, as owners of a squatter area, had the right to carry out some developments subject to permissions from relevant authorities. The permanent injunction restraining all development was not justified, as the area’s small size could only justify regulating the type or extent of development, not a total prohibition.
- Citation
- 19870723 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Ally Jongo; Appellant: Omari Rashid; Respondent: Mathew C. Haule
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Land Ownership, Squatter Rights, Procedural Irregularity, Land Development
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ally Jongo
Appellant
Omari Rashid
Appellant
Mathew C. Haule
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disputed area was a path/entrance or a plot belonging to the appellants
- 2 Whether the parties were entitled to the reliefs sought, specifically a permanent injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The disputed area was a plot belonging to the appellants, not a path or entrance. The appellants, as owners of a squatter area, had the right to carry out some developments subject to permissions from relevant authorities. The permanent injunction restraining all development was not justified, as the area’s small size could only justify regulating the type or extent of development, not a total prohibition.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Permanent injunction set aside
- Appellants' right to develop the plot recognized, subject to permissions from relevant authorities
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment