ally mkombozi vs republic 2011 tzca 191 28 september 2011
The application is incompetent because only the Full Court, not a single Justice, has jurisdiction to entertain it after a decision by a single Justice.
- Citation
- ally mkombozi vs republic 2011 tzca 191 28 september 2011
- Parties
- Applicant: Ally Mkombozi; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review
- Outcome
- Application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Review Applications
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ally Mkombozi
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a single Justice has jurisdiction to entertain an application for extension of time to file review after a previous decision by a single Justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent because only the Full Court, not a single Justice, has jurisdiction to entertain it after a decision by a single Justice.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction; only the Full Court may entertain such application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment