aloyce mafundi vs magezi simon others 2018 tzhc 2691 1 june 2018

aloyce mafundi vs magezi simon others 2018 tzhc 2691 1 june 2018

The appeal was filed out of time without leave of court; section 19(2) of Cap 89 requires an application for extension of time supported by affidavit, and exclusion of time is not automatic. The only remedy is dismissal of the appeal with costs.

Citation
aloyce mafundi vs magezi simon others 2018 tzhc 2691 1 june 2018
Parties
Appellant: Aloyce Faustine Mafundi; 1st Respondent: Magezi Laurian Simon; 2nd Respondent: Asst. Returning Officer Kyerwa Ward; 3rd Respondent: Returning Officer Kyerwa District Council; 4th Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Extension of Time, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aloyce Faustine Mafundi

Appellant

Magezi Laurian Simon

1st Respondent

Asst. Returning Officer Kyerwa Ward

2nd Respondent

Returning Officer Kyerwa District Council

3rd Respondent

The Attorney General

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
  2. 2 Whether the memorandum of appeal is maintainable in law

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed out of time without leave of court; section 19(2) of Cap 89 requires an application for extension of time supported by affidavit, and exclusion of time is not automatic. The only remedy is dismissal of the appeal with costs.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs under section 3(1) of Cap 89
  • Right of appeal explained