alphonce anael tarimo vs herman richard and another 2020 tzhc 3817 30 october 2020

The appeal was filed outside the prescribed time limit without prompt written application for copies and without seeking extension of time; therefore, it is time-barred and must be struck out.

Citation: alphonce anael tarimo vs herman richard and another 2020 tzhc 3817 30 october 2020
Parties: Appellant: Alphonce Anael Tarimo; 1st Respondent: Herman Richard; 2nd Respondent: Valency V. Tarimo
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 30 October 2020
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome: appeal struck out with costs
Legal Topics: Limitation of Actions, Vicarious Liability, Damages, Appeal Procedure
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Tort Law Limitation of Actions Vicarious Liability Damages Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Alphonce Anael Tarimo

Appellant

Herman Richard

1st Respondent

Valency V. Tarimo

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit
2 Whether inclusion of the second respondent was proper
3 Whether the second respondent is vicariously liable for the acts of the first respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed outside the prescribed time limit without prompt written application for copies and without seeking extension of time; therefore, it is time-barred and must be struck out.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out with costs

Orders

appeal struck out
costs awarded to respondents