alphonce kisukari vs paulo samwel 2020 tzhclandd 2222 7 september 2020

alphonce kisukari vs paulo samwel 2020 tzhclandd 2222 7 september 2020

Appeal is incompetent as the proper procedure is to file a reference under Order 7 of the Advocate Remuneration Order, 2015, not an appeal.

Citation
alphonce kisukari vs paulo samwel 2020 tzhclandd 2222 7 september 2020
Parties
Appellant: Alphonce Kisukari; Respondent: Paulo Samwel
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
appeal struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Bill of Costs, Appeals, Advocate Remuneration
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Bill of Costs Appeals Advocate Remuneration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alphonce Kisukari

Appellant

Paulo Samwel

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an appeal lies to the High Court from a decision on bill of costs by the District Land and Housing Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

Appeal is incompetent as the proper procedure is to file a reference under Order 7 of the Advocate Remuneration Order, 2015, not an appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out with costs

Orders

  • appeal struck out with costs