Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

amanyise mwakisengele vs republic 2020 tzhc 1903 14 july 2020

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offence is bailable under the law and the respondent did not object; therefore, bail is granted subject to specified conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted with conditions

Orders

  • Applicant to deposit T.shs. 3,670,000 cash as his portion of half the value stated in the charge
  • Applicant to provide two sureties, each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000, and both must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela
  • Applicant must surrender all travel documents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela; if none, proof from Immigration Authority required
  • Applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of the Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission from the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
  • Applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela whenever required
  • Verification of sureties and bond documents to be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela

02

Material facts

Parties

Amanyise M Wakisengele

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Rosemary Mgeni

Amounts and remedies

  • Applicant's Cash Bail Portion: TZS 3,670,000
  • Total Value Stated in the Charge: TZS 22,000,000
  • Surety Bond Amount Per Surety: TZS 1,835,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial for economic offences

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant stated he is facing charges under economic offences and prayed for bail.
Respondent
The respondent did not object to bail and confirmed the court's mandate to grant bail under section 29(4)(b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E. 2019

    Court has mandate to grant bail for bailable economic offences under section 29(4)(b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offence is bailable under the law and the respondent did not object; therefore, bail is granted subject to specified conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted with conditions

  • Applicant to deposit T.shs. 3,670,000 cash as his portion of half the value stated in the charge
  • Applicant to provide two sureties, each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000, and both must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela
  • Applicant must surrender all travel documents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela; if none, proof from Immigration Authority required
  • Applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of the Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission from the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
  • Applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela whenever required
  • Verification of sureties and bond documents to be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 14 July 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 14 July 2020

amanyise mwakisengele vs republic 2020 tzhc 1903 14 july 2020

IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DISTRICT REGISTRY OF MBEYA)

AT MBEYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 84 OF 2020 (Arising from Economic Case No. 05 of 2020 in the District Court of Kyela at Kyela) AMANYISE M W AKISENG ELE........................................................................APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC............................................................................................. RESPONDENT

RULING D ate of Hearing: 14/07/2020 D ate of Ruling : 14/07/2020 MONGELLA, J. The applicant is seeking for bail pending trial of Economic Crimes Case No. 05 of 2020 in Kyela District Court at Kyela. In this case he stands charged with two counts to wit: first, Malicious damage to property contrary to section 326 (3) (b) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2019, read together with section 51 (1) and paragraph 12 of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E. 2019, being property of the government of the United Republic of Tanzania. Second, attempt to commit an offence contrary to section 381 of the Penal Code, Cap 19 Page 1 of 3 R.E. 2019, being property of the government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The application was heard orally through virtual court. The applicant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by Ms. Rosemary Mgeni, learned State Attorney. The applicant just informed this Court that he is facing charge under economic offences and is praying for bail. Ms. Mgeni, for the respondent had no objection to the bail. She said that this Court has mandate to grant the bail under section 29 (4) (b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act. Since the offence is bailable under the law and the respondent has not raised any concerns to resist the granting of the same, I hereby grant the bail application upon the following conditions:- 1. The applicant should deposit T.shs. Three Million Six Hundred and Seventy Thousands (3,670,000) cash, being his portion on the half of the total am ount of the value stated in the charge, that is, T.shs. 22 , 000 , 000 /-.

2. The applicant should provide two sureties, w hereby each surety shall execute a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000/. The sureties must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela. Page 2 of 3 3. The applicant must surrender all travel docum ents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate presiding over his case in the District court of Kyela at Kyela. Where the applicant claims not to possess any travel documents, proof to that effect must be obtained from the Immigration Authority.

4. The applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of this Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission of the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela.

5. The applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela w henever needed to do so.

6. Verification of sureties and bond docum ents shall be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela. It is so ordered. Dated at Mbeya on this 14th day of July 2020 L. M. A/flxfi^LLA

JUDGE Court: Ruling delivered in Mbeya, through virtual Court, on this 14th day of July 2020 in the presence of the applicant appearing in person and Ms. Rosem ary Mgeni, learned State Attorney for the respondent L.M. ELLA

JUDGE Page 3 of 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2019, section 326(3)(b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E. 2019, section 51(1), paragraph 12, section 29(4)(b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code, Cap 19 R.E. 2019, section 381

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.