amanyise mwakisengele vs republic 2020 tzhc 1903 14 july 2020
- Citation
- amanyise mwakisengele vs republic 2020 tzhc 1903 14 july 2020
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 14 July 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 14 July 2020
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The offence is bailable under the law and the respondent did not object; therefore, bail is granted subject to specified conditions.
Court disposition
Bail granted with conditions
Orders
- Applicant to deposit T.shs. 3,670,000 cash as his portion of half the value stated in the charge
- Applicant to provide two sureties, each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000, and both must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela
- Applicant must surrender all travel documents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela; if none, proof from Immigration Authority required
- Applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of the Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission from the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
- Applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela whenever required
- Verification of sureties and bond documents to be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
02
Material facts
Parties
Amanyise M Wakisengele
ApplicantThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Rosemary MgeniAmounts and remedies
- Applicant's Cash Bail Portion: TZS 3,670,000
- Total Value Stated in the Charge: TZS 22,000,000
- Surety Bond Amount Per Surety: TZS 1,835,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial for economic offences
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant stated he is facing charges under economic offences and prayed for bail.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not object to bail and confirmed the court's mandate to grant bail under section 29(4)(b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E. 2019
Court has mandate to grant bail for bailable economic offences under section 29(4)(b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The offence is bailable under the law and the respondent did not object; therefore, bail is granted subject to specified conditions.
Court disposition
Bail granted with conditions
- Applicant to deposit T.shs. 3,670,000 cash as his portion of half the value stated in the charge
- Applicant to provide two sureties, each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000, and both must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela
- Applicant must surrender all travel documents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela; if none, proof from Immigration Authority required
- Applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of the Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission from the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
- Applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela whenever required
- Verification of sureties and bond documents to be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District Court of Kyela
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 14 July 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 14 July 2020
IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
JUDICIARY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DISTRICT REGISTRY OF MBEYA)
AT MBEYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 84 OF 2020 (Arising from Economic Case No. 05 of 2020 in the District Court of Kyela at Kyela) AMANYISE M W AKISENG ELE........................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC............................................................................................. RESPONDENT
RULING D ate of Hearing: 14/07/2020 D ate of Ruling : 14/07/2020 MONGELLA, J. The applicant is seeking for bail pending trial of Economic Crimes Case No. 05 of 2020 in Kyela District Court at Kyela. In this case he stands charged with two counts to wit: first, Malicious damage to property contrary to section 326 (3) (b) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 R.E. 2019, read together with section 51 (1) and paragraph 12 of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E. 2019, being property of the government of the United Republic of Tanzania. Second, attempt to commit an offence contrary to section 381 of the Penal Code, Cap 19 Page 1 of 3 R.E. 2019, being property of the government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The application was heard orally through virtual court. The applicant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by Ms. Rosemary Mgeni, learned State Attorney. The applicant just informed this Court that he is facing charge under economic offences and is praying for bail. Ms. Mgeni, for the respondent had no objection to the bail. She said that this Court has mandate to grant the bail under section 29 (4) (b) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act. Since the offence is bailable under the law and the respondent has not raised any concerns to resist the granting of the same, I hereby grant the bail application upon the following conditions:- 1. The applicant should deposit T.shs. Three Million Six Hundred and Seventy Thousands (3,670,000) cash, being his portion on the half of the total am ount of the value stated in the charge, that is, T.shs. 22 , 000 , 000 /-.
2. The applicant should provide two sureties, w hereby each surety shall execute a bond of Tshs. 1,835,000/. The sureties must be residents within the jurisdiction of the District Court of Kyela. Page 2 of 3 3. The applicant must surrender all travel docum ents, if any, to the Resident Magistrate presiding over his case in the District court of Kyela at Kyela. Where the applicant claims not to possess any travel documents, proof to that effect must be obtained from the Immigration Authority.
4. The applicant must not leave the jurisdiction of this Court Sub Registry Mbeya without written permission of the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela.
5. The applicant must report in person to the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela w henever needed to do so.
6. Verification of sureties and bond docum ents shall be effected by the presiding Resident Magistrate at the District court of Kyela. It is so ordered. Dated at Mbeya on this 14th day of July 2020 L. M. A/flxfi^LLA
JUDGE Court: Ruling delivered in Mbeya, through virtual Court, on this 14th day of July 2020 in the presence of the applicant appearing in person and Ms. Rosem ary Mgeni, learned State Attorney for the respondent L.M. ELLA
JUDGE Page 3 of 3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.