Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

amina m sunje vs tandahimba district council 2 others 2023 tzhc 23153 28 november 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court adopted the deed of settlement as it complied with legal requirements, binding all parties, marking the suit as settled and precluding further litigation on the same cause of action.

Court disposition

case settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • Deed of Settlement adopted as court decree
  • Plaintiff to be allocated Plot No. Block 'E' at Matogoro Area Tandahimba Mjini
  • Defendants to pay plaintiff TZS 15,000,000 in three equal installments by 15th December 2023
  • Each party to bear its own costs
  • Plaintiff precluded from instituting further suits on same cause of action

02

Material facts

Parties

Amina M. Sunje

Plaintiff

Tandahimba District Council

1st Defendant Counsel: Mr. Masunga Kamihanda

Mustafa Ayubu Mtulile

2nd Defendant

Attorney General

3rd Defendant Counsel: Mr. Masunga Kamihanda

Amounts and remedies

  • Compensation Amount: TZS 15,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Consent Judgment (deed of Settlement)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff claimed unlawful reallocation of her plot, sought return of land, rebuilding of destroyed house or compensation, declaration of nullity of reallocation, general damages, and costs.
Respondent
Defendants agreed to compensate plaintiff with another plot and TZS 15,000,000 in lieu of the original plot and property, acknowledging procedural irregularity in reallocation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 R.E. 2019

    Court may record settlement as decree if lawful and agreed by parties.

  2. 02

    Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 R.E. 2019

    Parties are bound by terms of settlement and precluded from further litigation on same cause of action.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court adopted the deed of settlement as it complied with legal requirements, binding all parties, marking the suit as settled and precluding further litigation on the same cause of action.

Court disposition

case settled by consent judgment

  • Deed of Settlement adopted as court decree
  • Plaintiff to be allocated Plot No. Block 'E' at Matogoro Area Tandahimba Mjini
  • Defendants to pay plaintiff TZS 15,000,000 in three equal installments by 15th December 2023
  • Each party to bear its own costs
  • Plaintiff precluded from instituting further suits on same cause of action

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 28 November 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 28 November 2023

amina m sunje vs tandahimba district council 2 others 2023 tzhc 23153 28 november 2023

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (MTWARA DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT MTWARA CIVIL CASE NO.04 OF 2022 AMINA M.SUNJE.................................... PLAINTIFF

VERSUS TANDAHIMBA DISTRICT COUNCIL.......................1st DEFENDANT MUSTAFA AYUBU MTULILE........ ..............2nd DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.......... ...... ..................3rd DEFENDANT

CONSENT JUDGEMENT (DEED OF SETTLEMENT) (Made under s.95 read together with Order VIII. C Rule 24, 33(a) and Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 R.E, 2019) 28/11/2023 LALTAIKA, X The plaintiff, AMINA M. SUNJE, on 25/02/2022 filed this suit against the defendants and claimed the foliowing reliefs as reproduced herein below: (a) That the suit be decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant and accordingly 2',rJ defendant be ordered to forwith removed himself and his belonging from Plot No. 209 Block "A" Pagel of 4 Tandahimba MJini and deliver to the plaintiff quiet and vacant possession of the suit. . (b) That, 2':<‘ Defendant be ordered to build the destroyed house of the Plaintiff and handle over as it was before unlawful demolition or compensation ofseventy million. (c) An order for declaration that the 1st Defendant re allocation to 2'"J Defendant a Plot No. 209 BlockA Tndanhimba MJini was null and void. (d) The Plaintiff be entitled to compensation of Tshs. 70,000,000/= (Seventy Million) as genera! damage. (e) That the cost of this suit be provided. (f) Any other relief (s) this Honorable Court may deem Just and equitable to grant. After completion of pleadings, the suit proceeded to the stage of mediation of which I was appointed to be the mediator. During mediation parties showed interest to settle the dispute and agreed to file the Deed

of Settlement. The Plaintiff always appeared in person and unrepresented while the first and third Defendants enjoyed the services of Mr. Masunga Kamihanda, learned State Attorney. On the other hand, the second Defendant appeared in person and unrepresented. In so doing, on 27/01/2023 they lodged in this court a Deed of Settlement. Besides that, the learned counsels have implored this court to record the Deed of Settlement as part of the Decree of the court. Having dispassionately gone through the filed Deed of Settlement, I am fortified that it confirms with the requirements of the law (O.XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap. 33 R.E. 2019]). Consequently, I proceed to adopt the terms and conditions of the registered Deed of Settlement to form part and parcel of this consent judgment as appearing herein below: - Page 2 of 4 "NOW THEREFORE PARTIES HERETOHAVE AGREEDAS FOLLOWS: - 1. That, formally Plot No. 209 Block A' located at Tandahimba MJini was allocated to the Plaintiff for terms and conditions that same be de veloped by constructing a residential house within a year, 2. That, the Plaintiff attempted to develop the said Plot, however, she did not comply to the conditions as required, as a result, Plot No. 209 Block "A" was reallocated to Mr. Mustafa Ayubu Mtulile (The Second Defendant named above).

3. That, it was later on disco vered that, though the Plaintiff did not execute the conditions envisaged in the one year Offer of the Right of Occupancy; cancelation of the same and subsequent reallocation of Plot No. 209 Block 'A' to Mr. Mustafa Ayubu Mtulile was also done without notification to the Plaintiff.

4. That, since Plot No. 209 Block !’A "has already been reallocated to Mr. Mustafa Ayubu Mtulile, and same has already been developed; the Plaintiff and the Defendant have agreed that the Plaintiff be compensated by allocating her another Plot, plus paying her TZS. 15,000,000/= both being compensation in place of her Land and anything which was found in that Land by the Second Defendant.

5. That, the Defendanthas agreed to pay the said money in three equal installments at TZS, 5,000,000/- per each Installment, as follows. The whole amount to be paid on or before 15th of December2023 6. Ihat, after execution of this Deed ofSettlement the Defendant has agreed to allocate to the Plaintiff the said Plot as per clause 4 above, known as Plot No Block "E" Located at Matogoro Area Tandahimba Mjini forthwith and the Plaintiff has agreed to the said arrangements.

7. That, after execution of this Deed of Settlement Land Case No. 04 of 2022 shall be marked settled out of Court annexed Mediation, and the Plaintiff shall be precluded from instituting another suit against the above-named Defendants on the: same cause of action dr disturbing and trespassing on the Suit Land.

8. That, this Deed of Settlement shall be extracted and recorded as a Court Decree capable of being executed upon failure by either party to fulfill the conditions-under this settlement.

9. That, this Deed of Settlement shall be governed by the laws of Tanzania and each party shall bear its own costs." Page 3 of 4 Therefore, I hereby declare that the executed Deed of Settlement effective from the date when it was lodged in this court, that is, on 28/11/2023, binds ail parties herein and to the subsequent applications or suits arising from the same cause of action. Thus, this court do hereby invoke powers under section 95 and Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap. 33 R.-E-. 2019], to mark Land Case No.4 of 2022 amicably settled. More so, the Terms and Conditions contained in the executed Deed of Settlement as summarized herein above, adopted hereto, forming part of this Court Judgment and Court Decree.

ALTAIKA Judgement delivered this 28th day of November 2023 in the presence of Mr. Robert Masunga Kami hands, learned State Attorney for the first and third Defendants while the Plaintiff and the second Defendant have appeared in person and unrepresented.

ALTAIKA

JUDGE 28.11.2023 Page 4 of 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 R.E. 2019 s.95

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Order XXIII Rule 3 of Civil Procedure Code Cap. 33 R.E. 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.