amina ramadhani vs mmasa juma 2018 tzhc 2379 20 february 2018

amina ramadhani vs mmasa juma 2018 tzhc 2379 20 february 2018

The appellant failed to prove lack of consent in the sale of matrimonial assets and failed to prove existence of assets claimed to be concealed. The trial and appellate courts properly divided existing assets and applied relevant legal principles. There was no legal merit in the grounds of appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
amina ramadhani vs mmasa juma 2018 tzhc 2379 20 february 2018
Parties
Appellant: Amina Ramadhan; Respondent: Mmasa Juma
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal, Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Division of Matrimonial Property, Dissolution of Marriage, Consent in Disposition of Matrimonial Assets
Source Language
english
Family Law Division of Matrimonial Property Dissolution of Marriage Consent in Disposition of Matrimonial Assets

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amina Ramadhan

Appellant

Mmasa Juma

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal, Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant consented to the sale of matrimonial properties
  2. 2 Whether all matrimonial properties should be included in the division
  3. 3 Whether there was evidence that some matrimonial properties still exist

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove lack of consent in the sale of matrimonial assets and failed to prove existence of assets claimed to be concealed. The trial and appellate courts properly divided existing assets and applied relevant legal principles. There was no legal merit in the grounds of appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs