Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

juma c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0242016 2019 afchpr 3 13 fevrier 2019

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court granted the applicant's requests to amend his application, submit additional evidence, and file submissions on reparations, finding it appropriate to allow these procedural steps within fifteen days from notification of the order.

Court disposition

Applicant's procedural requests granted

Orders

  • Applicant authorized to amend the application and submit additional evidence within fifteen days of notification of the order
  • Applicant authorized to file submissions on reparations within fifteen days of notification of the order

02

Material facts

Parties

Amini Juma

Applicant Counsel: William Ernest KIVUYO

République-Unie de Tanzanie

Respondent Counsel: Dr. Clement Julius MASHAMBA

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Interim Measures and Procedural Orders / Interlocutory Order on Procedural Requests

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant requested authorization to amend his application, submit additional evidence, and file submissions on reparations within specified deadlines.
Respondent
The respondent did not respond to the applicant's requests for authorization to amend the application or submit new evidence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 50 of the Rules of Court

    Right to submit additional evidence and amend pleadings in the interest of justice

  2. 02

    Article 8(2) of the Rules of Court

    Court's discretion to grant procedural requests to ensure fairness

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court granted the applicant's requests to amend his application, submit additional evidence, and file submissions on reparations, finding it appropriate to allow these procedural steps within fifteen days from notification of the order.

Court disposition

Applicant's procedural requests granted

  • Applicant authorized to amend the application and submit additional evidence within fifteen days of notification of the order
  • Applicant authorized to file submissions on reparations within fifteen days of notification of the order

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 1 January 2019

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 1 January 2019

juma c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0242016 2019 afchpr 3 13 fevrier 2019

CLq IDIb t9 oL Ao uT &^^' 0004e3 ECC qt- EDD 2

AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE .rl=ilt "+;ltt uTtIAo AFRIcANA AFRIGAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES

AFFAIRE

AMINI JUMA c. nEpueLteuE-uNlE DE TANZANIE neouErE No 024t2016 IOUNI 0h ORDONNANCE = * l.- 13 f6vrier 2019 i lj: 7 000{94t La Gour compos6e de : Sylvain ORE, Pr6sident ; Ben KIOKO, Vice-pr6sident ; Rafa6 BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Th6rdse MUI(AMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHII(AYA, Stella L ANUKAM, Juges ; et Robert ENO, Greffier Conform6ment A l'article 22 du Protocole relatif A la Charte africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples portant cr6ation d'une Cour africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples (ci-aprds < Ie Protocole >) et dr l'article 8(2) du Rdglement int6rieur de Ia Cour (ci-aprds < le Rdglement >), la Juge lmaniABouD de nationalit6 tanzanienne, n'a pas si6g6 dans l,affaire. En I'affaire

AMINI JUMA repr6sent6 par: M. William Ernest KIVUYO contre REPUBLIQUE-UNI E DE TANZANI E, repr6sent6e par: Dr' Clement Julius MASHAMBA Soticitor G6n6ral, Cabinet de I'Attorney g6n6ral; - aprds en avoir d6lib6r6, rend la pr6sente ordonnance 2 t 000{e3 I. LES PARTIES 1. Le Requ6rant, le nomm6 Amini Juma, est un ressortissant de la R6publique-Unie de Tanzanie qui a ete reconnu coupable de meurtre et condamn6 d la prison d vie, le 18 septembre 2008, par la Haute Cour de Tanzanie a Arusha. Par la suite, en appel, la Cour d'appel de Tanzanie si6geant dr Bukoba a remplac6 la peine initiale par la peine capitale, le 17 d6cembre 2011.

2. L'Eitat d6fendeur, la R6publique-Unie de Tanzanie, est devenu partie d la Charte africaine des droits de I'homme et des peuples (ci-aprds d6nomm6e < la Charte >) le 21 octobre 1986 et au Protocole relatif d la Charte africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples portant cr6ation d'une Cour africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples (ci-aprds d6nomm6 < le Protocole >) le 10 f6vrier 2006. ll a en outre depos6 la d6claration pr6vue i l'articte 34(6) du Protocole, le 2g mars 2010. II. SUR LES MESURES DEMANDEES PAR LES PARTIES 3. Le Requ6rant demande d la cour de rendre une ordonnance: < 1. Autorisant le Requ6rant modifier - ou d d6poser des observations compl6mentaires d - sa Requ6te, conform6ment d la demande formut6e le 1g octobre 2018; 2' Autorisant le Requ6rant dr pr6senter de nouvetles preuves en vertu de l'article 50 du Rdglement int6rieur de la Cour et conform6ment d ta demande formul6e le 19 octobre 2018 ; 3. Autorisant le Requ6rant dr d6poser les preuves et tes observations en question le 18 janvier 2019 ; 4. Autorisant le Requ6rant d d6poser ses observations sur les r6parations le 18 janvier 2019; 3 tv 00 0 {93 i "rIr 5. Renvoyant la r6daction et le prononc6 de t'arr6t en l'espdce jusqu,d ce que le Requ6rant ait l'occasion de ddposer les observations suppl6mentaires qu,il entend pr6senter >.

4. L'Etat d6fendeur n'a pas r6pondu dr la demande d'autorisation de modifier la Requ6te et de d6poser de nouvelles preuves. LA COUR: Fait droit d la demande du Requ6rant et l'autorise i modifier sa Requ6te et i d6poser des preuves additionnelles pour l'6tayer, dans un d6laide quinze (15) jours i compter de la date de notification de la pr6sente Ordonnance. il Fait droit a la demande du Requ6rant et t,autorise a d6poser ses observations sur les r6parations dans un d6lai de quinze (15) iours, dr compter de la date de notification de la pr6sente ordonnance. Ont sign6 Sylvain ORE, Pr6sident et Robert ENO, Greffier Fait d Arusha, ce treizidme jour du mois de f6vrier de l'an deux mit dix-neuf, en anglais et en frangais, le texte anglais faisant foi t'Hourtl 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Article 22 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 8(2) of the Rules of Court

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 50 of the Rules of Court

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.