amnesty international v tunisia communication 69 of 1992 1993 achpr 9 7 april 1993

amnesty international v tunisia communication 69 of 1992 1993 achpr 9 7 april 1993

The communication was declared inadmissible because it dealt with a case already settled in accordance with the principles of the Charter or relevant international instruments, as required by Article 56(7) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
amnesty international v tunisia communication 69 of 1992 1993 achpr 9 7 april 1993
Parties
Applicant: Amnesty International; Respondent: Republic of Tunisia
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 April 1993
Procedural Posture
Communication (human Rights) / Decision on Admissibility
Outcome
Communication declared inadmissible
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Communications, Wrongful Detention, Torture, African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law Admissibility of Communications Wrongful Detention Torture African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amnesty International

Applicant

Republic of Tunisia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication (human Rights) / Decision on Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the communication is admissible under Article 56(7) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The communication was declared inadmissible because it dealt with a case already settled in accordance with the principles of the Charter or relevant international instruments, as required by Article 56(7) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Court Disposition

Communication declared inadmissible