CIVIL APPEAL NO 98 OF 2024 AMSONS INDUSTRIES T LIMITED VS PARDEEP SING HANS AND 3 OTHERS
The certificate of delay dated 17th January 2024 was properly procured from the Registrar of the High Court, and only documents formally obtained from the Registrar constitute the valid record of appeal. The appeal was lodged within the statutory 60-day period from the date the complete documents were formally...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CIVIL APPEAL NO 98 OF 2024 AMSONS INDUSTRIES T LIMITED VS PARDEEP SING HANS AND 3 OTHERS
- Parties
- Appellant: Amsons Industries (T) Ltd; 1st Respondent: Pardeep Singh Hans; 2nd Respondent: Merey Ally Saleh; 3rd Respondent: Islam Ally Saleh; 4th Respondent: Dar es Salaam Cement Co. Ltd
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objections dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Delay, Time Limitation, Record of Appeal, Formal Procurement of Court Documents
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amsons Industries (T) Ltd
Appellant
Pardeep Singh Hans
1st Respondent
Merey Ally Saleh
2nd Respondent
Islam Ally Saleh
3rd Respondent
Dar es Salaam Cement Co. Ltd
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of delay dated 17th January 2024 was properly procured and valid for the appeal record
- 2 Whether the appeal was lodged within the statutory time limit
Ratio Decidendi
The certificate of delay dated 17th January 2024 was properly procured from the Registrar of the High Court, and only documents formally obtained from the Registrar constitute the valid record of appeal. The appeal was lodged within the statutory 60-day period from the date the complete documents were formally supplied, rendering the preliminary objections meritless.
Court Disposition
preliminary objections dismissed
Orders
- The two grounds of preliminary objection are dismissed for lack of merits.
- Costs to follow the final verdict of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment