andalus corner limited vs happyness j kikoti 2022 tzhcld 771 24 august 2022

andalus corner limited vs happyness j kikoti 2022 tzhcld 771 24 august 2022

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise decisions of its Deputy Registrar in execution proceedings; such decisions are not revisable and must be challenged by reference, not revision.

Citation
andalus corner limited vs happyness j kikoti 2022 tzhcld 771 24 august 2022
Parties
Applicant: Andalus Corner Limited; 1st Respondent: Happyness J. Kikoti; 2nd Respondent: Mary Tenga t/a Tegemeza Finance Co. & Court Broker
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Revision of Registrar's Orders, Execution Proceedings
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Revision of Registrar's Orders Execution Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andalus Corner Limited

Applicant

Happyness J. Kikoti

1st Respondent

Mary Tenga t/a Tegemeza Finance Co. & Court Broker

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revise a Deputy Registrar's decision in execution proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise decisions of its Deputy Registrar in execution proceedings; such decisions are not revisable and must be challenged by reference, not revision.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.