19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 4 June 1993
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 4 June 1993
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
- Appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
02
Material facts
Parties
Andrew Christian Simba
Appellant Counsel: Mr. HyeraRepublic
Respondent Counsel: Mrs. SaaAmounts and remedies
- Value of Tyres Obtained: TZS 648,450
- Value of Clothes Obtained: TZS 9,443.5
- Sentence Per Count (years): 5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay evidence
- 02
Whether there was sufficient corroboration to support the conviction
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The conviction was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and the appellant was not properly connected to the alleged offences.
- Respondent
- The State Attorney did not support the conviction, conceding it was based on hearsay evidence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General principles of criminal evidence law
Conviction cannot be based solely on hearsay evidence without corroboration.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.
Court disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
- Appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 4 June 1993
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 4 June 1993
.,.. -~ ~ "f IN '.1.'li.t. ltlu. CvUL·t'r. ul!' 'l\~N2.J..l\JlA H~Tfft~k A'l' .!Ji-i..l:( .i:.B SALAAM .t-1.f'P.1!..1..,1A'l'.c, JUi.foi.JICTION HIGL: CCUh'.i.' Ci-<Ilv1Il~.i-1.i, APP~i-i.L NO. 10 OF 1993 O~lGINAL CRihI~aL Cn~.ci ~L. 87 vF 1991 uF flLI: J..1lS'l1 hlGT COUtlT vF KIS1-d-{A\{i!, 11~·11 t<ICT AT KISARAw~ B.ciFU.r(t; ]'. J~o Jo N.UY1-i., ES~o, uIBTldCT M.ttGI6T.d.A'I'B ii.ND.KillW c;.i.:.,J..:>'l' lJ->.N S I!VillA •••••••• • ••••••••••••• APPBLLANT (O~iginal acc~.ed) versuo TH.lli i{..:..,}:-:0.lJ.;..JIC o • o o b o o a o o • o o o o o o o • • e o o o • o • o • o o ltfilSPQI~DENT JUiJG~1£NT j ~,1\Ui>E - .& J: ; i ANiJtltW CI~,.. :;:;.:,_I,1.l~ c.11-.B,-1. w&s with two others char, ed with two counts Qf obtaining 1:_;v,,us oy false pr~tenitas ~/s 302 of th0 Pen&,l Code in the district court Lf Kisaraw~ and up0n b~ing convicted ·was aenteneed to !ive years iLl;_Jri.sunr,11::nt on eu<.:h ccunt. 'l'his appeal is ajainst f'OllVl~tion _ and sentence:• Hr. Hyera I learne<.l counsel for the al--'pellu:nt, rais.ed 1~ .. twelve g;rounC.s uf UJ_Jpeal which, in· substance, crystc.,lliso into one s1ound relatir. 0 to the au.riiiss ion of hearsay evidence and 1::ias;i.ng the conviction on it. l•irs. Saa, lva1ned State ttttprney 1 did n'\ot \support ·, I the c0nvictiG,i en th(::' ground that the conviction is. based. ~n ~ear~a.r--· .eviuence. It Wc:s c.~:!.lc.~,___c.1 in the first
cvunt that Andrew Christian S.\imba; \ . Kassim Ally huscu <.1nu nbuallah 1Jaziri on 24th Januc.,ry, 1990 at· •the . '\ Coast .t<egion . h:... in ;:..ture in tl1t clistri-..t of Ilala, :Uur es Sal~aJD•. dd \ ' jointly and t~iwther obtain tweuty motor vehicle~ tyres wtrth .bj• : \ 648,450/= oy f~l~e~y pretending that they were employees of Ki~arawe uistrict Ccuucil an~ th~t they were sent by their employer to c~liect the tyres. lL the seconll count the chc.1.rge is th...Lt th(,j, three ac~u$ed persons on 22nc. Jc,.1:u<-<ry, 1990 d~Li joir,tly ahd together obtained\ ...... ,lothes worth ,..,hs. 9443/50 from tlw Coast hegion Main ;:;tore by f\altfely ' pretendin;; thc.t tl.ey were f;llllployec:s uf Kisarawe Vistrict Council!' nn-1 ' \ th~t they wcr~ sent by thei~ employer to collect the clothes. i \ 'l'he first viece vf eviue:nce which c on11ects the appellant wi:th tne case is tL0 clui1a by .l:'v. .1 vn1c; 1:-'.1Jl. Lh 1\.H:ii1.VJ1-d-<1-i. 1 th~.t Mwarngeni ~avala\. 1 told. him ~he c.1.~-.._,(;llant huu taken tht: lett&r c-0ntaiuing the list of \ authoris0d 0fficors tc be sent t0 tho C0~st Hegion hain btor~ ◄ 1he. ,...:_.. .. \ a~thorized of::.ic"rs are. th0 e,n0s wliv cuulu lawfully c0ll0ct goods _,..~ ·I · on oohu.1.f cf _.iz_rawe .l.listrict v0uncil of which .Pv-t.1 was its.. Ae-ting ', I \ .. -,/2. .. - 2 - .c.x.ecutiv~; vf:i:ic~r. r1.s hwc..m 6 eni LJ&Vala, whu is an
1.;,;;;_Jloyee cf the eouncilt w~s not calle~ to t~stify the &vidence of P~.l on this ~Jvir.t is ~learly hac..rsay. I\u r~E,S on is gi v0n why Zav~l& wu ;pout c .... lJ.0{: tL, ti;Btify. a rel&tct ie~uo is the ~tlciti0n of the n~me uf one Boniface Aomb~ tv thw li~t cf authoriEeu ~fficers in tha letter which P~.l hc1.d pl't:j_Ji;...:i.•.;_,u f:;r_ sending, tu th~ ht,in .:it0re. ·1'he s0c<.md. ac<.;uced was th~ ~riv~r uf an Isuzu lorry ~etistr&tiun ~u. 6M 1022 which Wei.AS us~(: t,~ C•vL.cct th~ twer.ty tyres from th1: bt0:cv. P'v-;.1 alleged/ th ..... t he· h~.l. ~:o:~0~: tli-= llriv-.:r tu c0nfirm if it Wc.s true he went and collactal t~~ tyrqs ~nG th~ ~river toltl him, in th~ presence of f'll<l.2 an(, i-'~i.'/ t;:_., t ho Wc,.s with the u~-:t:,ellant when h{; cc.,1:~ect•4. -- the iyrGs. i~ both .h~.2 anc: J:'11.7 d<inied th&t tt.- GOC-Jnd accu1:Hid/ ~ hl:l.u m~ntiva..;c. thJ c..i-,t'cllant c.1.t "'11 G\ rl;asonabl~ , ..,u:;t exists a, tu wh~th..:1• t>.0 i:.tL cl.Lant Wi...3 invulv...-C: ut u11. ihJ fd:,t that both .l:'1'1.J unl,: .l:'~1.4 ,Lt: work at t:1~· Cu ..,&t .1.:0:.:gion l•1ain .:>t1..,..:'0 c'.L.-not ~aentify t~e a~jcllant as thu ·p .. ~s0n who was with t~J dri~er wh~~- 't'hu· 'lc~·;;,,:r· ue~nt ·there t0 cul~ect th~ tw~ntf t~ros loDVes ' ., . . tna pr~uet~tit:,1 cf£..im ·thc..t i ~ ,;..,_,:; the c:.ppellant whc \:cnt '- l . with· ti:{G- l:>CC-:11·.. [f---c~·used to
"c0l1":c1; t~.~ {y;:::s t/itb. n--- leg on L., .. -1 T ".. ' 0 which tu S"Ci.'.:i.ll.. ln °!1:.;c·t h cth ,Jitn..;.:..ct::ts tit.lkecl c.1.bou-'.; a Nr. 1So11if .... cu :t·~cr:tb..:, \/:10 hid.. hi£ phctut:rci.ph r..rn.r namt: :i:n a lett0r they were· e,i·v..,,:;:.. 1:... hc> of' th~i:;·e :witnesses s;;/iU th...·t tlle,. · . rf>on c:allec1. 1{rombi:.: 'is t:,c .,.,__ :.·'13llt..:nt· 1w:hose- ·r~.::.sl rt<-me· .is ;anc.lr~w .Si:,iba. I :. .i.:110 ,:vi..01;Cv \Jf "the ·2n~ &C~USE::d 'wh~ :.,;s· the ~friY ..,r vf the io~ry th,,.~· c,:,J.ll-Ct-~:tl 'tht: .t'yr...:s ft1..,ni th_c:_. store is ac ,"c,mplfce 1:1Jiu~nce in SU f .... r ;-;i.s it r~i~tcs "t(., tlit: ap1Jt::ll~"nt~ .;s th..:re we.s . ,n~ co;r~·be,,r. . tilis cviJer,ce, tht: trial -cuurt, sh'cu·lci nut hci~e acte4 on 'it ·as 1;1. ·b·c..~is of conv1ct'i·0n. :i·h0 st'c..t~rJt:.nt' riiade by the -zn'<f , ., I to. 11ut . - , him ;o ·.1.'hu::,i in tht: c,UStnce "uf cvrrobur,j.tion no w-,,i°&ii 1~h0 s-,C 1. fr:. e ouri.t which ."'l.L.a 6 c1s _obtyining, _olct_;.i.ls by ful&e ' ., ·'"'· .. . . . ~l:l~•-"'s ,:.~ __ .. ,.1'0, tiu 1h""ve ~e-:.n put on th.: ~hil3:G1:: by Li£.t,;ke: '.l'tu:vuah0u·t th.:: ·c:.ci.._l proc-=~rlin 6 s · rGferi.711c;e_ is only rn .. 4e to tho ♦ ., A - ., • • iwant,y ty:.·us c.n: no 1110ut,ion ,iti 111.:.:..c:e of .tn1.: clothc:s. f• • I ' .. .., • • '1'h-r,.; is no l. In t).._.. fin.;..l r--,,·sult l
c.1gr,.;.: ,,i.th ,,.hr •. liyer.a ,' ·J.oar;.l-.:d cvunsel 1-il the <--~ h ;.Jl i.:.,:i.lt, tlllL! hr~-- -~J.c4u. leurn.Q<l.iSt..utt;i',,~ttvrn.;y, thc.ct b \be •.unvi(.;tivll .:;i th1:: E..lji:eL c.nt _in :thi:::: ~as1= ,is wi thc.ut l:egal • ,. " • t • ~a;i,f~Ci.:..tic1~ .... L, thcr-.:: ii:; 110 ,;VL 0r..cc in ~-UP., or.~. 1-1C~ c:r:J.ing,ly /I - 3 - l ul,low t~~is UJi:.?Go.l, 4Uc:..sh th~ ~unviction · c...nt.. 1>et ~-~ide the s1,mtencc. '1·; .. 0 L\JlJ'vl.u:.,nt i,Ni.Ji.__...;;,,, CILL.,1.'1.,!1: bll--3Ji. i~ to 1J..:.: ; 1 • ·~i 1993 in t:::..v :;:n:"sc.:..cE: of i•1is ..... PenC.'-,eli ..:iti:.tt: J.. tt0:CZI<.::Y £or r1;spcn<len·• 1 A..i:Jp~ll""nt c:~hscnt. JU:UvL l'\T l.J.r.i< ES SALAAM o ·, ,itb J_~t .. ~+~~~).
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.