Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside

Orders

  • Conviction quashed
  • Sentence set aside
  • Appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held

02

Material facts

Parties

Andrew Christian Simba

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Hyera

Republic

Respondent Counsel: Mrs. Saa

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Tyres Obtained: TZS 648,450
  • Value of Clothes Obtained: TZS 9,443.5
  • Sentence Per Count (years): 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The conviction was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and the appellant was not properly connected to the alleged offences.
Respondent
The State Attorney did not support the conviction, conceding it was based on hearsay evidence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General principles of criminal evidence law

    Conviction cannot be based solely on hearsay evidence without corroboration.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.

Court disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside

  • Conviction quashed
  • Sentence set aside
  • Appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 4 June 1993

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 4 June 1993

19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam

.,.. -~ ~ "f IN '.1.'li.t. ltlu. CvUL·t'r. ul!' 'l\~N2.J..l\JlA H~Tfft~k A'l' .!Ji-i..l:( .i:.B SALAAM .t-1.f'P.1!..1..,1A'l'.c, JUi.foi.JICTION HIGL: CCUh'.i.' Ci-<Ilv1Il~.i-1.i, APP~i-i.L NO. 10 OF 1993 O~lGINAL CRihI~aL Cn~.ci ~L. 87 vF 1991 uF flLI: J..1lS'l1 hlGT COUtlT vF KIS1-d-{A\{i!, 11~·11 t<ICT AT KISARAw~ B.ciFU.r(t; ]'. J~o Jo N.UY1-i., ES~o, uIBTldCT M.ttGI6T.d.A'I'B ii.ND.KillW c;.i.:.,J..:>'l' lJ->.N S I!VillA •••••••• • ••••••••••••• APPBLLANT (O~iginal acc~.ed) versuo TH.lli i{..:..,}:-:0.lJ.;..JIC o • o o b o o a o o • o o o o o o o • • e o o o • o • o • o o ltfilSPQI~DENT JUiJG~1£NT j ~,1\Ui>E - .& J: ; i ANiJtltW CI~,.. :;:;.:,_I,1.l~ c.11-.B,-1. w&s with two others char, ed with two counts Qf obtaining 1:_;v,,us oy false pr~tenitas ~/s 302 of th0 Pen&,l Code in the district court Lf Kisaraw~ and up0n b~ing convicted ·was aenteneed to !ive years iLl;_Jri.sunr,11::nt on eu<.:h ccunt. 'l'his appeal is ajainst f'OllVl~tion _ and sentence:• Hr. Hyera I learne<.l counsel for the al--'pellu:nt, rais.ed 1~ .. twelve g;rounC.s uf UJ_Jpeal which, in· substance, crystc.,lliso into one s1ound relatir. 0 to the au.riiiss ion of hearsay evidence and 1::ias;i.ng the conviction on it. l•irs. Saa, lva1ned State ttttprney 1 did n'\ot \support ·, I the c0nvictiG,i en th(::' ground that the conviction is. based. ~n ~ear~a.r--· .eviuence. It Wc:s c.~:!.lc.~,___c.1 in the first

cvunt that Andrew Christian S.\imba; \ . Kassim Ally huscu <.1nu nbuallah 1Jaziri on 24th Januc.,ry, 1990 at· •the . '\ Coast .t<egion . h:... in ;:..ture in tl1t clistri-..t of Ilala, :Uur es Sal~aJD•. dd \ ' jointly and t~iwther obtain tweuty motor vehicle~ tyres wtrth .bj• : \ 648,450/= oy f~l~e~y pretending that they were employees of Ki~arawe uistrict Ccuucil an~ th~t they were sent by their employer to c~liect the tyres. lL the seconll count the chc.1.rge is th...Lt th(,j, three ac~u$ed persons on 22nc. Jc,.1:u<-<ry, 1990 d~Li joir,tly ahd together obtained\ ...... ,lothes worth ,..,hs. 9443/50 from tlw Coast hegion Main ;:;tore by f\altfely ' pretendin;; thc.t tl.ey were f;llllployec:s uf Kisarawe Vistrict Council!' nn-1 ' \ th~t they wcr~ sent by thei~ employer to collect the clothes. i \ 'l'he first viece vf eviue:nce which c on11ects the appellant wi:th tne case is tL0 clui1a by .l:'v. .1 vn1c; 1:-'.1Jl. Lh 1\.H:ii1.VJ1-d-<1-i. 1 th~.t Mwarngeni ~avala\. 1 told. him ~he c.1.~-.._,(;llant huu taken tht: lett&r c-0ntaiuing the list of \ authoris0d 0fficors tc be sent t0 tho C0~st Hegion hain btor~ ◄ 1he. ,...:_.. .. \ a~thorized of::.ic"rs are. th0 e,n0s wliv cuulu lawfully c0ll0ct goods _,..~ ·I · on oohu.1.f cf _.iz_rawe .l.listrict v0uncil of which .Pv-t.1 was its.. Ae-ting ', I \ .. -,/2. .. - 2 - .c.x.ecutiv~; vf:i:ic~r. r1.s hwc..m 6 eni LJ&Vala, whu is an

1.;,;;;_Jloyee cf the eouncilt w~s not calle~ to t~stify the &vidence of P~.l on this ~Jvir.t is ~learly hac..rsay. I\u r~E,S on is gi v0n why Zav~l& wu ;pout c .... lJ.0{: tL, ti;Btify. a rel&tct ie~uo is the ~tlciti0n of the n~me uf one Boniface Aomb~ tv thw li~t cf authoriEeu ~fficers in tha letter which P~.l hc1.d pl't:j_Ji;...:i.•.;_,u f:;r_ sending, tu th~ ht,in .:it0re. ·1'he s0c<.md. ac<.;uced was th~ ~riv~r uf an Isuzu lorry ~etistr&tiun ~u. 6M 1022 which Wei.AS us~(: t,~ C•vL.cct th~ twer.ty tyres from th1: bt0:cv. P'v-;.1 alleged/ th ..... t he· h~.l. ~:o:~0~: tli-= llriv-.:r tu c0nfirm if it Wc.s true he went and collactal t~~ tyrqs ~nG th~ ~river toltl him, in th~ presence of f'll<l.2 an(, i-'~i.'/ t;:_., t ho Wc,.s with the u~-:t:,ellant when h{; cc.,1:~ect•4. -- the iyrGs. i~ both .h~.2 anc: J:'11.7 d<inied th&t tt.- GOC-Jnd accu1:Hid/ ~ hl:l.u m~ntiva..;c. thJ c..i-,t'cllant c.1.t "'11 G\ rl;asonabl~ , ..,u:;t exists a, tu wh~th..:1• t>.0 i:.tL cl.Lant Wi...3 invulv...-C: ut u11. ihJ fd:,t that both .l:'1'1.J unl,: .l:'~1.4 ,Lt: work at t:1~· Cu ..,&t .1.:0:.:gion l•1ain .:>t1..,..:'0 c'.L.-not ~aentify t~e a~jcllant as thu ·p .. ~s0n who was with t~J dri~er wh~~- 't'hu· 'lc~·;;,,:r· ue~nt ·there t0 cul~ect th~ tw~ntf t~ros loDVes ' ., . . tna pr~uet~tit:,1 cf£..im ·thc..t i ~ ,;..,_,:; the c:.ppellant whc \:cnt '- l . with· ti:{G- l:>CC-:11·.. [f---c~·used to

"c0l1":c1; t~.~ {y;:::s t/itb. n--- leg on L., .. -1 T ".. ' 0 which tu S"Ci.'.:i.ll.. ln °!1:.;c·t h cth ,Jitn..;.:..ct::ts tit.lkecl c.1.bou-'.; a Nr. 1So11if .... cu :t·~cr:tb..:, \/:10 hid.. hi£ phctut:rci.ph r..rn.r namt: :i:n a lett0r they were· e,i·v..,,:;:.. 1:... hc> of' th~i:;·e :witnesses s;;/iU th...·t tlle,. · . rf>on c:allec1. 1{rombi:.: 'is t:,c .,.,__ :.·'13llt..:nt· 1w:hose- ·r~.::.sl rt<-me· .is ;anc.lr~w .Si:,iba. I :. .i.:110 ,:vi..01;Cv \Jf "the ·2n~ &C~USE::d 'wh~ :.,;s· the ~friY ..,r vf the io~ry th,,.~· c,:,J.ll-Ct-~:tl 'tht: .t'yr...:s ft1..,ni th_c:_. store is ac ,"c,mplfce 1:1Jiu~nce in SU f .... r ;-;i.s it r~i~tcs "t(., tlit: ap1Jt::ll~"nt~ .;s th..:re we.s . ,n~ co;r~·be,,r. . tilis cviJer,ce, tht: trial -cuurt, sh'cu·lci nut hci~e acte4 on 'it ·as 1;1. ·b·c..~is of conv1ct'i·0n. :i·h0 st'c..t~rJt:.nt' riiade by the -zn'<f , ., I to. 11ut . - , him ;o ·.1.'hu::,i in tht: c,UStnce "uf cvrrobur,j.tion no w-,,i°&ii 1~h0 s-,C 1. fr:. e ouri.t which ."'l.L.a 6 c1s _obtyining, _olct_;.i.ls by ful&e ' ., ·'"'· .. . . . ~l:l~•-"'s ,:.~ __ .. ,.1'0, tiu 1h""ve ~e-:.n put on th.: ~hil3:G1:: by Li£.t,;ke: '.l'tu:vuah0u·t th.:: ·c:.ci.._l proc-=~rlin 6 s · rGferi.711c;e_ is only rn .. 4e to tho ♦ ., A - ., • • iwant,y ty:.·us c.n: no 1110ut,ion ,iti 111.:.:..c:e of .tn1.: clothc:s. f• • I ' .. .., • • '1'h-r,.; is no l. In t).._.. fin.;..l r--,,·sult l

c.1gr,.;.: ,,i.th ,,.hr •. liyer.a ,' ·J.oar;.l-.:d cvunsel 1-il the <--~ h ;.Jl i.:.,:i.lt, tlllL! hr~-- -~J.c4u. leurn.Q<l.iSt..utt;i',,~ttvrn.;y, thc.ct b \be •.unvi(.;tivll .:;i th1:: E..lji:eL c.nt _in :thi:::: ~as1= ,is wi thc.ut l:egal • ,. " • t • ~a;i,f~Ci.:..tic1~ .... L, thcr-.:: ii:; 110 ,;VL 0r..cc in ~-UP., or.~. 1-1C~ c:r:J.ing,ly /I - 3 - l ul,low t~~is UJi:.?Go.l, 4Uc:..sh th~ ~unviction · c...nt.. 1>et ~-~ide the s1,mtencc. '1·; .. 0 L\JlJ'vl.u:.,nt i,Ni.Ji.__...;;,,, CILL.,1.'1.,!1: bll--3Ji. i~ to 1J..:.: ; 1 • ·~i 1993 in t:::..v :;:n:"sc.:..cE: of i•1is ..... PenC.'-,eli ..:iti:.tt: J.. tt0:CZI<.::Y £or r1;spcn<len·• 1 A..i:Jp~ll""nt c:~hscnt. JU:UvL l'\T l.J.r.i< ES SALAAM o ·, ,itb J_~t .. ~+~~~).

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 302

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.