19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19930604 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew Christian Simba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Hearsay Evidence, Obtaining Goods by False Pretences, Standard of Proof, Corroboration
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Christian Simba
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction was based on inadmissible hearsay evidence
- 2 Whether there was sufficient corroboration to support the conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because it was based on hearsay evidence without corroboration, and there was no legal justification for upholding the conviction or sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
.,.. -~ ~ "f IN '.1.'li.t. ltlu. CvUL·t'r. ul!' 'l\~N2.J..l\JlA H~Tfft~k A'l' .!Ji-i..l:( .i:.B SALAAM .t-1.f'P.1!..1..,1A'l'.c, JUi.foi.JICTION HIGL: CCUh'.i.' Ci-<Ilv1Il~.i-1.i, APP~i-i.L NO. 10 OF 1993 O~lGINAL CRihI~aL Cn~.ci ~L. 87 vF 1991 uF flLI: J..1lS'l1 hlGT COUtlT vF KIS1-d-{A\{i!, 11~·11 t<ICT AT KISARAw~ B.ciFU.r(t; ]'. J~o Jo N.UY1-i., ES~o, uIBTldCT M.ttGI6T.d.A'I'B ii.ND.KillW c;.i.:.,J..:>'l' lJ->.N S I!VillA •••••••• • ••••••••••••• APPBLLANT (O~iginal acc~.ed) versuo TH.lli i{..:..,}:-:0.lJ.;..JIC o • o o b o o a o o • o o o o o o o • • e o o o • o • o • o o ltfilSPQI~DENT JUiJG~1£NT j ~,1\Ui>E - .& J: ; i ANiJtltW CI~,.. :;:;.:,_I,1.l~ c.11-.B,-1. w&s with two others char, ed with two counts Qf obtaining 1:_;v,,us oy false pr~tenitas ~/s 302 of th0 Pen&,l Code in the district court Lf Kisaraw~ and up0n b~ing convicted ·was aenteneed to !ive years iLl;_Jri.sunr,11::nt on eu<.:h ccunt. 'l'his appeal is ajainst f'OllVl~tion _ and sentence:• Hr. Hyera I learne<.l counsel for the al--'pellu:nt, rais.ed 1~ .. twelve g;rounC.s uf UJ_Jpeal which, in· substance, crystc.,lliso into one s1ound relatir. 0 to the au.riiiss ion of hearsay evidence and 1::ias;i.ng the conviction on it. l•irs. Saa, lva1ned State ttttprney 1 did n'\ot \support ·, I the c0nvictiG,i en th(::' ground that the conviction is. based. ~n ~ear~a.r--· .eviuence. It Wc:s c.~:!.lc.~,___c.1 in the first cvunt that Andrew Christian S.\imba; \ . Kassim Ally huscu <.1nu nbuallah 1Jaziri on 24th Januc.,ry, 1990 at· •the . '\ Coast .t<egion . h:... in ;:..ture in tl1t clistri-..t of Ilala, :Uur es Sal~aJD•. dd \ ' jointly and t~iwther obtain tweuty motor vehicle~ tyres wtrth .bj• : \ 648,450/= oy f~l~e~y pretending that they were employees of Ki~arawe uistrict Ccuucil an~ th~t they were sent by their employer to c~liect the tyres. lL the seconll count the chc.1.rge is th...Lt th(,j, three ac~u$ed persons on 22nc. Jc,.1:u<-<ry, 1990 d~Li joir,tly ahd together obtained\ ...... ,lothes worth ,..,hs. 9443/50 from tlw Coast hegion Main ;:;tore by f\altfely ' pretendin;; thc.t tl.ey were f;llllployec:s uf Kisarawe Vistrict Council!' nn-1 ' \ th~t they wcr~ sent by thei~ employer to collect the clothes. i \ 'l'he first viece vf eviue:nce which c on11ects the appellant wi:th tne case is tL0 clui1a by .l:'v. .1 vn1c; 1:-'.1Jl. Lh 1\.H:ii1.VJ1-d-<1-i. 1 th~.t Mwarngeni ~avala\. 1 told. him ~he c.1.~-.._,(;llant huu taken tht: lett&r c-0ntaiuing the list of \ authoris0d 0fficors tc be sent t0 tho C0~st Hegion hain btor~ ◄ 1he. ,...:_.. .. \ a~thorized of::.ic"rs are. th0 e,n0s wliv cuulu lawfully c0ll0ct goods _,..~ ·I · on oohu.1.f cf _.iz_rawe .l.listrict v0uncil of which .Pv-t.1 was its.. Ae-ting ', I \ .. -,/2. .. - 2 - .c.x.ecutiv~; vf:i:ic~r. r1.s hwc..m 6 eni LJ&Vala, whu is an 1.;,;;;_Jloyee cf the eouncilt w~s not calle~ to t~stify the &vidence of P~.l on this ~Jvir.t is ~learly hac..rsay. I\u r~E,S on is gi v0n why Zav~l& wu ;pout c .... lJ.0{: tL, ti;Btify. a rel&tct ie~uo is the ~tlciti0n of the n~me uf one Boniface Aomb~ tv thw li~t cf authoriEeu ~fficers in tha letter which P~.l hc1.d pl't:j_Ji;...:i.•.;_,u f:;r_ sending, tu th~ ht,in .:it0re. ·1'he s0c<.md. ac<.;uced was th~ ~riv~r uf an Isuzu lorry ~etistr&tiun ~u. 6M 1022 which Wei.AS us~(: t,~ C•vL.cct th~ twer.ty tyres from th1: bt0:cv. P'v-;.1 alleged/ th ..... t he· h~.l. ~:o:~0~: tli-= llriv-.:r tu c0nfirm if it Wc.s true he went and collactal t~~ tyrqs ~nG th~ ~river toltl him, in th~ presence of f'll<l.2 an(, i-'~i.'/ t;:_., t ho Wc,.s with the u~-:t:,ellant when h{; cc.,1:~ect•4. -- the iyrGs. i~ both .h~.2 anc: J:'11.7 d<inied th&t tt.- GOC-Jnd accu1:Hid/ ~ hl:l.u m~ntiva..;c. thJ c..i-,t'cllant c.1.t "'11 G\ rl;asonabl~ , ..,u:;t exists a, tu wh~th..:1• t>.0 i:.tL cl.Lant Wi...3 invulv...-C: ut u11. ihJ fd:,t that both .l:'1'1.J unl,: .l:'~1.4 ,Lt: work at t:1~· Cu ..,&t .1.:0:.:gion l•1ain .:>t1..,..:'0 c'.L.-not ~aentify t~e a~jcllant as thu ·p .. ~s0n who was with t~J dri~er wh~~- 't'hu· 'lc~·;;,,:r· ue~nt ·there t0 cul~ect th~ tw~ntf t~ros loDVes ' ., . . tna pr~uet~tit:,1 cf£..im ·thc..t i ~ ,;..,_,:; the c:.ppellant whc \:cnt '- l . with· ti:{G- l:>CC-:11·.. [f---c~·used to "c0l1":c1; t~.~ {y;:::s t/itb. n--- leg on L., .. -1 T ".. ' 0 which tu S"Ci.'.:i.ll.. ln °!1:.;c·t h cth ,Jitn..;.:..ct::ts tit.lkecl c.1.bou-'.; a Nr. 1So11if .... cu :t·~cr:tb..:, \/:10 hid.. hi£ phctut:rci.ph r..rn.r namt: :i:n a lett0r they were· e,i·v..,,:;:.. 1:... hc> of' th~i:;·e :witnesses s;;/iU th...·t tlle,. · . rf>on c:allec1. 1{rombi:.: 'is t:,c .,.,__ :.·'13llt..:nt· 1w:hose- ·r~.::.sl rt<-me· .is ;anc.lr~w .Si:,iba. I :. .i.:110 ,:vi..01;Cv \Jf "the ·2n~ &C~USE::d 'wh~ :.,;s· the ~friY ..,r vf the io~ry th,,.~· c,:,J.ll-Ct-~:tl 'tht: .t'yr...:s ft1..,ni th_c:_. store is ac ,"c,mplfce 1:1Jiu~nce in SU f .... r ;-;i.s it r~i~tcs "t(., tlit: ap1Jt::ll~"nt~ .;s th..:re we.s . ,n~ co;r~·be,,r. . tilis cviJer,ce, tht: trial -cuurt, sh'cu·lci nut hci~e acte4 on 'it ·as 1;1. ·b·c..~is of conv1ct'i·0n. :i·h0 st'c..t~rJt:.nt' riiade by the -zn'<f , ., I to. 11ut . - , him ;o ·.1.'hu::,i in tht: c,UStnce "uf cvrrobur,j.tion no w-,,i°&ii 1~h0 s-,C 1. fr:. e ouri.t which ."'l.L.a 6 c1s _obtyining, _olct_;.i.ls by ful&e ' ., ·'"'· .. . . . ~l:l~•-"'s ,:.~ __ .. ,.1'0, tiu 1h""ve ~e-:.n put on th.: ~hil3:G1:: by Li£.t,;ke: '.l'tu:vuah0u·t th.:: ·c:.ci.._l proc-=~rlin 6 s · rGferi.711c;e_ is only rn .. 4e to tho ♦ ., A - ., • • iwant,y ty:.·us c.n: no 1110ut,ion ,iti 111.:.:..c:e of .tn1.: clothc:s. f• • I ' .. .., • • '1'h-r,.; is no l. In t).._.. fin.;..l r--,,·sult l c.1gr,.;.: ,,i.th ,,.hr •. liyer.a ,' ·J.oar;.l-.:d cvunsel 1-il the <--~ h ;.Jl i.:.,:i.lt, tlllL! hr~-- -~J.c4u. leurn.Q<l.iSt..utt;i',,~ttvrn.;y, thc.ct b \be •.unvi(.;tivll .:;i th1:: E..lji:eL c.nt _in :thi:::: ~as1= ,is wi thc.ut l:egal • ,. " • t • ~a;i,f~Ci.:..tic1~ .... L, thcr-.:: ii:; 110 ,;VL 0r..cc in ~-UP., or.~. 1-1C~ c:r:J.ing,ly /I - 3 - l ul,low t~~is UJi:.?Go.l, 4Uc:..sh th~ ~unviction · c...nt.. 1>et ~-~ide the s1,mtencc. '1·; .. 0 L\JlJ'vl.u:.,nt i,Ni.Ji.__...;;,,, CILL.,1.'1.,!1: bll--3Ji. i~ to 1J..:.: ; 1 • ·~i 1993 in t:::..v :;:n:"sc.:..cE: of i•1is ..... PenC.'-,eli ..:iti:.tt: J.. tt0:CZI<.::Y £or r1;spcn<len·• 1 A..i:Jp~ll""nt c:~hscnt. JU:UvL l'\T l.J.r.i< ES SALAAM o ·, ,itb J_~t .. ~+~~~).