martine vs christopher 2005 tzhc 36 29 july 2005

martine vs christopher 2005 tzhc 36 29 july 2005

The trial court correctly evaluated the evidence, properly applied the law regarding presumption of marriage and division of assets under Section 160(2) of the Law of Marriage Act, and made a justified decision on custody based on the welfare of the children. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Citation
martine vs christopher 2005 tzhc 36 29 july 2005
Parties
Appellant: Andrew Martine; Respondent: Grace Christopher
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Division of Matrimonial Assets, Custody of Children, Maintenance, Presumption of Marriage, Cohabitation
Source Language
English
Family Law Division of Matrimonial Assets Custody of Children Maintenance Presumption of Marriage Cohabitation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Martine

Appellant

Grace Christopher

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial court failed to properly evaluate the evidence and appreciate the appellant's evidence
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in the distribution of matrimonial assets
  3. 3 Whether the trial court erred in granting custody to the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court correctly evaluated the evidence, properly applied the law regarding presumption of marriage and division of assets under Section 160(2) of the Law of Marriage Act, and made a justified decision on custody based on the welfare of the children. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Custody and maintenance orders of the trial court upheld