20021105 TZHC Bukoba
There is no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts, which were based on credible evidence and a visit to the locus in quo confirming the appellant had overstepped the boundary.
- Citation
- 20021105 TZHC Bukoba
- Parties
- Appellant: Angelo Balimujula; Respondent: Anthony Michael
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Boundary Dispute, Concurrent Findings, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Angelo Balimujula
Appellant
Anthony Michael
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant interfered with the boundary between the parties' shambas
- 2 Whether there is ground to interfere with concurrent findings of fact by lower courts
Ratio Decidendi
There is no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts, which were based on credible evidence and a visit to the locus in quo confirming the appellant had overstepped the boundary.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment