anna mbakile vs ded geita 2020 tzhc 1632 30 july 2020
The court found that the applicant's termination was both substantively and procedurally unfair. The arbitrator's award of 15 months' compensation was inadequate given the circumstances, including the length of time the applicant was out of employment and the unfairness of the termination. The court exercised its discretion to increase the compensation to 60 months' remuneration instead of ordering reinstatement, considering the unsuitability of the working relationship.
- Citation
- anna mbakile vs ded geita 2020 tzhc 1632 30 july 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Anna Mbakile; Respondent: DED Geita
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Compensation, Reinstatement, Employment Dispute, Procedural Fairness, Substantive Fairness
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anna Mbakile
Applicant
DED Geita
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the applicant was substantively and procedurally unfair
- 2 Whether the compensation awarded by the arbitrator was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's termination was both substantively and procedurally unfair. The arbitrator's award of 15 months' compensation was inadequate given the circumstances, including the length of time the applicant was out of employment and the unfairness of the termination. The court exercised its discretion to increase the compensation to 60 months' remuneration instead of ordering reinstatement, considering the unsuitability of the working relationship.
Court Disposition
Application partly allowed
Orders
- Order of 15 months' compensation set aside
- Respondent to pay applicant 60 months' remuneration as compensation for unfair termination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment