anthony johny kazembe vs intertek testing services ea pty lt 2022 tzhcld 703 20 july 2022

anthony johny kazembe vs intertek testing services ea pty lt 2022 tzhcld 703 20 july 2022

The requirement to serve a notice of intention to seek revision applies to revision applications, not to applications for extension of time. Therefore, the preliminary objection is misplaced and lacks merit.

Citation
anthony johny kazembe vs intertek testing services ea pty lt 2022 tzhcld 703 20 july 2022
Parties
Applicant: Anthony Johny Kazembe; Respondent: Intertek Testing Services (EA) (Pty) Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
20 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Preliminary Objection, Notice of Intention to Seek Revision
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Johny Kazembe

Applicant

Intertek Testing Services (EA) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether failure to serve notice of intention to seek revision renders the application incompetent
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection is on a pure point of law

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement to serve a notice of intention to seek revision applies to revision applications, not to applications for extension of time. Therefore, the preliminary objection is misplaced and lacks merit.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • Preliminary objection dismissed
  • Application for extension of time to be determined on merit