anthony masonda vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2054 21 december 2018
The applicant failed to provide good and sufficient reasons for the delay, did not account for each day of delay, and did not provide evidence of absence or when he became aware of the award. The representative was aware of the award date and collected the award, negating the reasons advanced for delay.
- Citation
- anthony masonda vs pangea minerals ltd 2018 tzhc 2054 21 december 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Masonda; Respondent: Pangea Minerals Limited
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time to File Revision / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Delay in Filing, Labour Disputes
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Masonda
Applicant
Pangea Minerals Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time to File Revision / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good and sufficient cause for delay to warrant extension of time to file revision out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide good and sufficient reasons for the delay, did not account for each day of delay, and did not provide evidence of absence or when he became aware of the award. The representative was aware of the award date and collected the award, negating the reasons advanced for delay.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment