20061207 TZCA Dar es Salaam1
- Citation
- 20061207 TZCA Dar es Salaam1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 7 December 2006
- Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 7 December 2006
- Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Execution is stayed due to the existence of a receiving order under the Bankruptcy Act, which protects the estate of the applicant pending determination of the intended appeal.
Court disposition
stay of execution granted
Orders
- Execution stayed pending determination of intended appeal.
- Respondent to forward decree to Receiver, Administrator General.
02
Material facts
Parties
Anverali Kakal
Applicant Counsel: Mr. ChandooAluminium Africa Ltd
Respondent Counsel: Ms Hamida Sheikh03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
whether sufficient grounds exist for staying execution in light of bankruptcy proceedings
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant will suffer irreparable loss if stay is disallowed; balance of convenience favors applicant; bankruptcy proceedings and receiving order require debt to be directed to receiver, not applicant.
- Respondent
- Applicant admitted debt but family declined to settle; bankruptcy cause filed to avoid settling debt; execution should proceed by civil imprisonment as warrant of arrest exists.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sections 5 to 16 of the Bankruptcy Act, Cap 25 R.E. 2002
Estate of judgment debtor protected upon issuance of receiving order; execution stayed pending appeal.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Execution is stayed due to the existence of a receiving order under the Bankruptcy Act, which protects the estate of the applicant pending determination of the intended appeal.
Obiter and limits
- Respondent advised to list debt with the Receiver by forwarding decree to Administrator General.
Court disposition
stay of execution granted
- Execution stayed pending determination of intended appeal.
- Respondent to forward decree to Receiver, Administrator General.
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 7 December 2006
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 7 December 2006
. • _i:$]1~."Hi ....
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 OF 2006 ANVERAL KAKAL ••••...••••.•• ~ •...•..•..•.•..••....•••.••• ~ ....•• APPLICANT AND ALUMINIUM AFRICA LTD .................................. RESPONDENT (Application for Stay of Execution from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam) ' . (BWANAJ.) Dated the 2 nd day of May, 2006 In Commercial Case No. 200 of 2002 RULING:. 30 October & 7 December, 2006 MUNUO, J, A.: · The applicant, Anverali Kakal, through the services of Mr. Chandoo, learned advocate, is seeking stay of execution of the Ruling and Order dated the 2.5.2006 in Commercial case No. 200 of 2002 in the Commercial Division of the High Court, before Dr. Bwana, J. ... ;• 2 The grounds of the application are stated in the Notice of Motion, namely that: (a) the applicant will suffer irreparable loss if stay of execution is disallowed; (b) on the balance of convinience, the applicant will suffer greater hardship than the respondent if execution proceeds before the intended appeal is determined, and ( c) the case is problematic in view of the Bankruptcy Petition No. 1 of 2006 in which a receiving order has been made per annexture MHC 4 to the notice of motion. The application for stay of execution is supported by an affidavit deponed to Mr. Mustafa Chandoo, learned advocate. He stated at paragraph 6 of his affidavit that the applicant is an old man. 3 He was
a passive partner in the firm of Alif Hardware, the judgment debtor in Commercial Case No. 2006 of 2002. Being a passive partner, the applicant became a judgment debtor by operation of law. Mr. Chandoo further stated that as the applicant is impecunious, he filed Bankruptcy Cause No. 1 of 2006 in the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam wherein a receiving order, annexture MHC 4 was issued making the Administrator General, the official Receiver of the Court, the constituted Receiver of the estate of the applicant debtor. It is the view of counsel for the applicant, in view of the above bankruptcy cause, the debt should now be directed not the applicant, but to the receiver of his estate, the Administrator General. Ms Hamida Sheikh, learned advocate for the respondent opposed the application. She filed a counter-affidavit contending that the, applicant admitted the debt but his famil~y arrog,antlY declined to settle it. On the bankruptcy cause putting the estate of the applicant, under receivership, Ms Sheikh contended that the said 4 cause was filed to deceptively avoid settling the debt so execution should proceed by way of civil• imprisonment as there is a warrant of arrest per annexture Dl to the counter-affidavit. Annexture Dl, was issued by the High Court, Commercial Division, on the 16.5.2006 consequent to the Ruling of the Commercial Court on the 2.5.2006 and the
Drawn Order arising therefrom, dated the 22 nd May, 2006. Apparently the bankruptcy cause was filed on the 30th January, 2006 and as per the Receiving Order, the said Order was issued on the 20th April, 2006, almost a month prior to the issuance of the Warrant of Arrest on the 16th May, 2006. The issue is whether there is sufficient ground for staying execution in this case. In view of the pending bankruptcy cause and the Receiving Order in force, I am of the settled mind that allowing execution to proceed will be problematic in view of the provisions of Sections 5 to 16 of the Bankruptcy Act, Cap 25 R.E.
2002. The said sections have provisions relating to a Receiving Order and Proceedings Consequent on Order. 5 On the balance of convinience, therefore, and in view of the j provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, section 5 of which protects the estate of the applicant judgment debtort execution is stayed pending the determination of the intended appeal. The respondent would be I well advised to list the debt in question with the Receiver, by I I forwarding the decree to the said Receiver, The Administrator General. ' I I DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this l~th day of November, 2006. < I E. N. MUNUO
JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. I I Dated at Dar es Salaam this ih day of December, 2006.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.