19700427 TZCA Dar es Salaam2
The conviction was upheld as the trial court properly assessed the evidence, found the discrepancies immaterial, and the appellant's arguments lacked sufficient grounds. Sentencing was varied to conform to lawful practice, but the total punishment remained unchanged.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19700427 TZCA Dar es Salaam2
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant (unnamed, former judicial officer in the employ of the Judicial Service); Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal summarily rejected
- Legal Topics
- Theft by Public Servant, Sentencing, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant (unnamed, former judicial officer in the employ of the Judicial Service)
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for theft by public servant under sections 265 and 270 of the Penal Code was supported by evidence
- 2 Whether discrepancies in witness evidence undermine the conviction
- 3 Whether the sentencing was proper and lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was upheld as the trial court properly assessed the evidence, found the discrepancies immaterial, and the appellant's arguments lacked sufficient grounds. Sentencing was varied to conform to lawful practice, but the total punishment remained unchanged.
Court Disposition
appeal summarily rejected
Orders
- Sentences varied to conform to lawful practice: two years imprisonment and twenty-four strokes of corporal punishment on the second count; two years imprisonment without corporal punishment on the third count; sentences to run concurrently.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Criminal Appet:1 no. 17! of 1970 (Originu.l Criminal C&ee Ro. 87 of' 1969 of the 1Jistriot Court of Ulmne;a :Otntrict at Mahenn;e}. veraun '!'HE !lt-:1.,l.HH,IG • ., ......... Hi.'$SPONDEJJ•r Cf! 'JW:l5t 1:-;"t Co1mt: Thtd:t by }JiJ.blio ae:.rvm; t, c/ o 270 um1 265 ,(if the FeJHil Code .. 2nd Ooun-t: '.l'haft, o/s 265 of.' the Penal Code .. 31."d Cowitt T.hof1; by _puhlio i.mrvant c/,:; 270 lind. 265 of th.a I'em,.l (;ode• 4th Gountt Theft c/s 265 of tho h:m.Hl Ood.e .. 5th Coun:t, rl'h;;if't by ;;mbl1o fJ,:)1~v11nt o/n 27() d1d :265 of th<1 Penal Cod{). ' Ii't11YN, ,1. The {.q>1,ollt1nt who c>t; 'tho 1:1. terhil time H1.m fl ,.J.tit-icial o1'fi(H.'.lt> in th(:l employ of the J\1.dici ..u·:l, w_,1.3 oonvicteu in tho Dictrict Cour·t of 1Jlw1:_;a of off'onoca of oto:~1. ing by tt 1-;1.i.hli<; t.KH'vun't, oontr:..,ry to aection$ 26; und c.70 of -the Penal Code and wap 1;;mnteno1-;d to c- totul period. of i,wo yetu·u impriGonmen1, c..nd to :receiv~ twenty-four strckui:i of cor,por,:.,l puntbhme.lit. He tlON desir1:·n:1 to appeal ~guins"t, such c;onvichtJ!W o.n,l oorrtenoee. .Phe t!,H10 wan carE1fully triod by the '.Di.otri<)t .Mat;iotn:te and a leugtn,y 1 judg111t~ni. w~s wri ttc:n in which th.a Court deHl t :with ell thti evid-om:e bef oro· i~. ln the first pi,rt of hia Peti tio.n of /,.pper.il, tho aoGueod dr-uwn thG i::itte.ntioti of thi:3 Court to the f'.ct t.ht\t the oviuo11ce on tho ; i'.t•at Count w,ui t.1,omowhat oon.i.rt\dictor.';", aa some, 16:f'. j.;tht:'¼ ...·wi;t;not:llatHJ ref er:rec:L to Ci □ um of H!Ht..- 15/- HB hi.iving beon iht1 t.mount which th0 nppellt.nt ru(;~ived in u .tette.t'. i.o the rorer;t Gffh;er, w.hil<3 others thou~ht t,w. t tbe t.mo,~nt Wtts Shs. 10/- only. The ctpy;elltmt cl·.,imf: that the tri,~l .m,"'gb11tr.i.tto should .i:u.ve :fou.m.t thut thu wit.nesmni woro lying to the Court and Bhould there.fore htnre :rejeotec1 tho wl1,,l~1 of the (niid.e.nce in l't,Sp,.,;o·t of "this Got.mt. Uhat the roitgi,.;-hwi;e h-.,13 d.ontl ii, tc, cons:d.d,1:rr tt.vJ ditferlJ).t1Gee in tho evidence o:f the v1.::rio1.v; wit.tHHrn1es on this one point. !le f'ou.tht thut .,.uch differerwes were 1rrobably the re milt of mere foi·e:et ult1,HHJ w_itl :1oi of die.h.Jt1E;,a1:y fmd tha.t !Hl coulr.l thqrof'or·e trnJ\ .ly :rely on the romai--ni.ng evidence of these witncssoa (which did not conflict in any wu,y) as being reliable. The ¼Ceu11:1<0d. h1.~a uompl~1irt~d tht.t, when. th¢ .Police toe,k hi.a Gmsll l',od 1 they .mi!.l,'h t htiV<:i romcrvtHl money from it d11d thi.ls h>ctve luid the •my open. to the i'n.ming of the aeoond Count of the tla~:i•t o:f t:iho~ f.39/65 by th.e accunod .• This content.ion tho t:rLtl inagisti-ato also dei:.l t with and e~.mined the <'JViderice before him. He Cf~.me to the conolurjion that the question :roallf b~ter.e him wUh regard to aruo.b coi:1te.nticm WtH:1 th,, wtu:::Nab(}u.t.~ ot' the key to tho bo:r., {iwh:ioh wr~a loeki:l!d) nn.d. 11(, f 01.:mu i;lu1;1s tt wow.tt net b♦:ive been pot1si,ble f'<u.~ tho pr..ilim~ to h,,we t~oted in t~tach ma.nnR.f. trn Ute appellunt .JuggeetetL. In respect of. the third Count of tile tht::ft by the aooused of She. 20/- 1,;hic appears to hiAVE't befm oloarly pro\l'ed by the l)rooeoution Ul'l:d tllo m~gisi:-rtd:r, found H1~t the evidence before him fully auppor1:ad tf1$ Ooun,t. fh~tc we.ria som~ I-rd.no!' diooropun.oie~ in the evillence whioh thtl mngistrt1te fatm~- ttore of no mt-terinl imr.,o:rtsn ·e to the findine of guilty- on this pfLrt of 1:;he Ctt:;i rto .. - .... -~-~ T -.,_, . ., - - - - - ~ . - ..... J!I., ,J1AI ffl.fflce• tHt11'01.'t'! the lot1n,-r (foart l.er,ti,Ht no rErnso.t1able doubt an to tho gt.±1 t of th& aeeuaed, and 'th,l.t t,h-& lip!)cH::1 is id. t1wu't su.b0tunoe., '11'n.rr.1ing nt:Hf to the ~enta:.ic;es impo J~,t, t.ho trL'.\l Court ht;s impoaetl n ~a:ntence o:f' six m.on.tho imprisonm$ll t on. thm first Coutlti two ye.arc and twen:ty-:fou.r strokes ot: corpo1~a1 p1,mlahm.c11t in l'.',H1,pe,ct of tha second Count ru1d o similtt~ oentenoe in tllo third Count, orderi11n t,1",it al.l aut!h aentonoes rur1 et1neur:,1,~rrt1~~~- ~~}lir,,; awde of' ~tmt~4oinl$ le... ve.$ 001i1<1 ..d1ing to be deoired, tiO it iG olce,:t'lly i1t1po1;1sible foe a !,eteou to Nooi:ve two lots ◊f tw1:m.ty-fcur t:1t:flcok,HJ of corporal puni i:ghm.ttn t 'ooti.c 1,u,"rontly' • The co.1.•rtio t nwde of 1:1en:tie.nc.iing :te to ord.(l:t' o:n tlle s~cond Count th.at. . tho aooueod sh,111 t.erve t't sen.tenr~e of two 3ear.ts imprtt1orut1i':.U t JJ!'.ld ,.m<l{', ra·o 'h'10:1'ty-:,:•oar 1rt:rok1a s of o-0rpo~ul pt.1.ni r.:.hrn""nt 1 r1hU,(l oh the third. f~om,t s..;;nte11ce is one r.1:f. tw,e jC.:.rc imp:r1acmm-un-l, without OOl'pON1l, purti,:Ghmient., ~11 seutenC€it! of imp:rison.a1or.rt r~main,e oonou.r.1.·entl;y. I connf:HfU~t1tl;y va~ i~h.e oentennaii impotied by th.a trial Court to make them cor.forra the normal · mathod of oi,d.e,rin~ au.ch puniehmont::;; r.mcd1 ord.ar will not ot' cturlH~ huve Mf effec't; on th.t➔ to·tal lJUtiiehmen.t which the t.ippolJ.,illt ia to u.."ldere;o. After -x,eu.ding the r~oo ti this Gour·t is a~tioi'ied thut the ,.1.ppf.n,l hns been lotlevd W'i'tiwu:t nny BUf'fioh)rl't ground. ol oom1Jlni11t 1:;nd (01.;.ve fo;;' the ve,riu-tiofl. in the torm of se:nience whit:Jh I huve no~:~)d ubove) I ocmEO(J:uen.tly orda1.~ that it lil.i' fo thwith au.m.mtr.il;y x,aj(~oted~ lb!' ea f:.;,.::liklil. 2.7 t .• J,pril, 1970. r