19980226 TZHC Dar es Salaam

19980226 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent acted without good cause or violated natural justice. The applicant, as a mere transporter, is not liable for the taxes, but the consignees and M/S Addax (T) Ltd should intervene to clear the taxes. The application for certiorari...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
19980226 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Parties
Respondent: Commissioner General, Tanzania Revenue Authority; Applicant: Applicant (name not specified)
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 February 1998
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Orders of Certiorari and Mandamus
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Customs and Excise, Natural Justice
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tax Law Judicial Review Certiorari Mandamus Customs and Excise Natural Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner General, Tanzania Revenue Authority

Respondent

Applicant (name not specified)

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Orders of Certiorari and Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the respondent acted without good cause in impounding the applicant's vehicles
  2. 2 Whether there was a failure of natural justice in the respondent's decision
  3. 3 Whether the applicant, as a mere transporter, is liable for payment of taxes

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent acted without good cause or violated natural justice. The applicant, as a mere transporter, is not liable for the taxes, but the consignees and M/S Addax (T) Ltd should intervene to clear the taxes. The application for certiorari and mandamus is not granted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Each party to bear its own costs