19980226 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent acted without good cause or violated natural justice. The applicant, as a mere transporter, is not liable for the taxes, but the consignees and M/S Addax (T) Ltd should intervene to clear the taxes. The application for certiorari...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19980226 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Respondent: Commissioner General, Tanzania Revenue Authority; Applicant: Applicant (name not specified)
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Orders of Certiorari and Mandamus
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Customs and Excise, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner General, Tanzania Revenue Authority
Respondent
Applicant (name not specified)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Orders of Certiorari and Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent acted without good cause in impounding the applicant's vehicles
- 2 Whether there was a failure of natural justice in the respondent's decision
- 3 Whether the applicant, as a mere transporter, is liable for payment of taxes
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the respondent acted without good cause or violated natural justice. The applicant, as a mere transporter, is not liable for the taxes, but the consignees and M/S Addax (T) Ltd should intervene to clear the taxes. The application for certiorari and mandamus is not granted.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear its own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
:-·.l • j-,...;..'"'-~ ~,_,......,_ ~--- . 111/J ;,.__,l-;. _,{\.d..1.-1 j ~~ MISC. CIVIL C1tUSE I,Oo 10 OF 97 COMMISSIONER GENERAL FOHo •••••••• o .,RESPOI~)ENT TANZANIA REVENUE J~UTHORITY o ------------- ]_ U L I N Go DUBESHI 2 J. The applicant throu 5h his c,unsel Dr. Mvunri has filed this application _,_ seeking the following reliefs:- an order of ce:rtrorari to mere the Hir;h Court tc quesh the Rcspom'.ents decisicn of impounding the applicants vehicles., an order of mandamus directing the Res:i_)ondcnt t, r,:::store the vehicles to th(, applicnnt and. costs to b0. provided for' The grounds upon which the reliefs are being sought are:- acting without good cause; faiture of natural justice., Tl;lis court granted kave to the applicant t::: fil0 the 1xpr;licaticn and the main applicatir_,n was set for hearing on 4/9/97., That date was filmd in presence of both parties Gome 4/9/97, the respondents did nnt appear, Dr. Mvungi applied for and was 8rantGd leave to proceed cxparte Dr. Mvungi submitted·tefcre the Court th&t the applicant is angaged in transporting fuel destined to countries ~eyond cur boarders. That he gets the transit fuel M/S Addax Tanzani~ Ltd. ThCLt ho is paid by the consigree to transport tho fuel; that th<~ consignees are conpnnics beses in neighbowring aoo2/•• ------ ... •· called t:c. c: "i)cr;1oc:c~.ti,_'. lfo·,:,u.:.11.:.. ..> cL':2 Cr 1.gc, e.E vrcl l as ]Viru.<.:ongc, 2.nd Cogeci 1 .Democr·::1.tic Hepublic also in thn / : Con,;o. IIe submi ttcd that tL.:: arplicant is a me:rc transporter and his obl::.gaticn i.s merely +_ · b. c:.m,::ipor-': fuel t(;, the consignees; has contezideci. that •if t;l'c fuels '· :: net rea~}~,ccl it::: destination, it is fer the consignees to complaino This proposicion was exemplified 1:iy a ,.locurnent r0fcrced to as Annexture X (TRA 000 1926 RCTD 244)which is a doc~m8nt issued by the · Respondent to show that the t'.'.'anspcrter c1pplicant crossed the boarder to Zaire Dr Mvunci refuted the nlle,::c.1.ticn thnt his client did .not cross the boo.rder; C1 and that the responcu:mt have net ,:::hnllc,nged. th-.1 authent:i/ty cf Document TRA 000 1926 or 0000244 of date 1~/11/96. It is pertinant to observe thnt a careful exmninc:,_tion of the document TRA 000 1926 or 0000244 indicates tho.tit be8.rs Custom & Excise stamps from ·• NAK0NDE in the Republic of Zambia. The date is 9/12/96;. Suffice to add that f there is also a Tnnz:v,ia Customs stamp 0f 9/12/96 from Tunduma boarder towno I The issue that thee transporter crossed into Zaire cannot be v1;rified by l 'a.ommient TRll 000 1926 nlone which, if ta.ken at its face value shows the that transporter crossed into Zambia and not Zaire_., I am awn.ro/according to same + d acument th. e final destino.vion . was Zc::are . Tunc.u!:la., via ' D. 1 10.' ;c>1e l t rans.1. t/we . *~; 1 reach Zaire'2 We are not cc±tnin,, a Again Dr. Mvungi stc1ted that it ir/ practice fer the TRA respondents to issue a bond to the ar•plicant which is discl12. r-gcd en re 2ntry. According to Dr• Mvungi the applicant 1:ms gi v:cn this document. This document, 1;Jhich in my ~ew,would be of scm<c, considcrcblc importr.mcc has not been made available to ~ i s court, despite extention •)f time c;iven fer the purpose. I tend to al:::rree thnt the issue of payment of taxes as demanded by the respondent should be the rcspor1sibility of l·VS Addax (T) Ltd and _the consignees, and not bo be shouldered by the applicnnt, whom it is cc.ntencled, is n mere transporter. However,if the applicants vcrsicn is tc be b<:olieved, it should not be a herculean task for the Consigm,es and M/S Ac~clax HI) Ltd to cc1me to his rescue c.nd clear the taxes due. For the reasons I have endev-cured tci explnin. 1 I am not satisfied that ~ case for thci prayed for orders lns lxen m::;tde out. I decline therefore to grant the application. Each party to be'-..t; own ¢csts. Delivered before AoG. Bubeshi Mr. Fungamtama for Hvungi for Applicants JUDGE Mr. Beleko for TRA. 26/2/98.