ally mkombozi vs republic 2014 tzca 254 6 march 2014

ally mkombozi vs republic 2014 tzca 254 6 march 2014

The application was struck out for incompetence because it confused the remedies of review and revision and was improperly brought before a single Justice, contrary to the Court of Appeal Rules.

Citation
ally mkombozi vs republic 2014 tzca 254 6 march 2014
Parties
Applicant: Applicant (Name not specified); Respondent: Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
6 March 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application struck out for incompetence.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review and Revision, Jurisdiction of Single Justice
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review and Revision Jurisdiction of Single Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant (Name not specified)

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to file review is competent before a single Justice of the Court
  2. 2 Whether the remedies of review and revision are distinct and should not be used interchangeably

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out for incompetence because it confused the remedies of review and revision and was improperly brought before a single Justice, contrary to the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for incompetence.

Orders

  • Application is struck out.