Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19980827 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Delay was caused by illness, supported by medical evidence, constituting circumstances beyond applicant's control; extension granted.

Court disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Appeal to be filed within thirty days of this date
  • No order for costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Applicant

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Taslim2c

Respondent

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file appeal

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant argued that illness prevented timely filing of appeal, supported by medical evidence of cholera and malaria.
Respondent
Respondent was absent and did not present arguments.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general civil procedure principles

    Extension of time may be granted if delay is caused by circumstances beyond applicant's control.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Delay was caused by illness, supported by medical evidence, constituting circumstances beyond applicant's control; extension granted.

Court disposition

application allowed

  • Appeal to be filed within thirty days of this date
  • No order for costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 27 August 1998

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 27 August 1998

19980827 TZHC Dar es Salaam

__ __ -~ P•.T ·:· .,.{_ ,...~·~I ...':. \L'l.)'i.M ·: e -''0 J • o 17-1/97 _,.' .,. I~l1I,Il;JG __,_ _.,.,__... _ Thi.s is an applics.ti011 for exfontion of bx,"" i:Jithin ,_,hich to appeal. Accordin ' . to the support in-:- evi ·cnce tlh, applicant fell sick a,s she was tra.vellin::': to Dar e1J s,_1L=tan to file ·,.,r 2.·rx:al., There i,s nedical evLlence tbat she contracte'l choler" -.Jo1.1 c1al2,ri2, so~.;1 c1.ftGr she had recovered fror1 c'.1ol•2r3.., .Sho was a~l:nitte~1 to v2rious ::Iispenoaries w:1ere she was treated- I arn t112refore S::'tisfic'::~ t 11 ?t the 'el~} to file the appeal in tir;1e \·/a3 caused ~-'::: circn''13hll1CGC, ,eyon 1 :1er C'.Jntrol. The 2p::-ilic::i_tion ir:, 2]_lovred as pr2,yed. A-cJ·1·-::n.l co 1,e filed within thirty > ys of t'-•is dotG. No oTL:;l' for ccsts i,s uac~eo Delivered. Jtf'.),'1'\!; '--~----=t.J; 27/3/1998 Mr. Taslim2c, Adv~cate: For Applicc'Jlt Absent: For Respondent~

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.