Lusako
The disbursement of TZS 7,697,217,708.00 was made through lawful budget reallocation within the ambit of the appropriated budget, supported by an Appropriation Act and proper warrants. No evidence established a breach of constitutional or statutory procedures. The Controller & Auditor General and Attorney General acted within their mandates. Audit queries were subsequently clarified and closed. No violation of Articles 136, 137, 143 of the Constitution or Section 47(1)(a) of the Budget Act, 2014 occurred.
- Citation
- Lusako
- Parties
- Petitioner: Alphonce Lusako; 1st Respondent: The Controller & Auditor General; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appropriation of Public Funds, Budget Reallocation, Judicial Review, Constitutional Breach, Audit Powers
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alphonce Lusako
Petitioner
The Controller & Auditor General
1st Respondent
The Attorney General
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the disbursement of TZS 7,697,217,708.00 from the Consolidated Fund to Mwanza Regional Secretariat breached constitutional and statutory procedures
- 2 Whether the Controller & Auditor General and Attorney General failed in their constitutional duties regarding the disbursement
- 3 Whether the actions constituted violations of Article 136, 137, 143 of the Constitution and Section 47(1)(a) of the Budget Act, 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The disbursement of TZS 7,697,217,708.00 was made through lawful budget reallocation within the ambit of the appropriated budget, supported by an Appropriation Act and proper warrants. No evidence established a breach of constitutional or statutory procedures. The Controller & Auditor General and Attorney General acted within their mandates. Audit queries were subsequently clarified and closed. No violation of Articles 136, 137, 143 of the Constitution or Section 47(1)(a) of the Budget Act, 2014 occurred.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition dismissed in its entirety
- Each party to bear its own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment