dahrooj and others v arab republic of egypt communication 614 of 2016 2018 achpr 126 18 october 2018

dahrooj and others v arab republic of egypt communication 614 of 2016 2018 achpr 126 18 october 2018

The complainant failed to submit arguments and evidence on admissibility within the prescribed and extended time limits, despite being duly notified. The Commission found no interest in prosecuting the communication and, following its established jurisprudence, struck out the communication for lack of diligent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
dahrooj and others v arab republic of egypt communication 614 of 2016 2018 achpr 126 18 october 2018
Parties
Complainant: Mr. Eid Mohammed Ismil Dahrooj and two others (represented by AED and 4 others); Respondent: Arab Republic of Egypt
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint / Struck Out at Admissibility Stage
Outcome
struck out for lack of diligent prosecution
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Complaints, Diligent Prosecution, Torture, Arbitrary Detention, Fair Trial, Prisoners' Rights, Enforced Disappearance
Source Language
english
Human Rights Law International Law Admissibility of Complaints Diligent Prosecution Torture Arbitrary Detention Fair Trial Prisoners' Rights +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Eid Mohammed Ismil Dahrooj and two others (represented by AED and 4 others)

Complainant

Arab Republic of Egypt

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Complaint / Struck Out at Admissibility Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant submitted arguments and evidence on admissibility within the required time frame
  2. 2 Whether the complaint should be struck out for lack of diligent prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to submit arguments and evidence on admissibility within the prescribed and extended time limits, despite being duly notified. The Commission found no interest in prosecuting the communication and, following its established jurisprudence, struck out the communication for lack of diligent prosecution.

Court Disposition

struck out for lack of diligent prosecution