sarni and another represented by european alliance for human rights v arab republic of egypt communication 574 15 2018 achpr 139 22 february 2018

sarni and another represented by european alliance for human rights v arab republic of egypt communication 574 15 2018 achpr 139 22 february 2018

The complainant failed to submit arguments and evidence on admissibility within the stipulated and extended deadlines, demonstrating lack of diligent prosecution, warranting strike-out of the communication.

Citation
sarni and another represented by european alliance for human rights v arab republic of egypt communication 574 15 2018 achpr 139 22 february 2018
Parties
Complainant: Mr. Ammar Muhammad Badee Abdel-Magied Sarni; Complainant: Dr. Muhammad Badee Abdel-Magied Sarni; Respondent: Arab Republic of Egypt
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Communication Before African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights / Strike Out Decision at Admissibility Stage
Outcome
Communication struck out for lack of diligent prosecution.
Legal Topics
Right to Life, Prohibition of Torture, Right to Fair Trial, Discrimination, Enforced Disappearance, Death Penalty, Prisoners' Rights
Source Language
English
Human Rights Law International Law Right to Life Prohibition of Torture Right to Fair Trial Discrimination Enforced Disappearance Death Penalty +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Ammar Muhammad Badee Abdel-Magied Sarni

Complainant

Dr. Muhammad Badee Abdel-Magied Sarni

Complainant

Arab Republic of Egypt

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication Before African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights / Strike Out Decision at Admissibility Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complaint was diligently prosecuted
  2. 2 Whether the complainant complied with the requirement to submit on admissibility

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to submit arguments and evidence on admissibility within the stipulated and extended deadlines, demonstrating lack of diligent prosecution, warranting strike-out of the communication.

Court Disposition

Communication struck out for lack of diligent prosecution.