mebara v cameroon communication 41612 2015 achpr 3 8 august 2015
The Commission found that the Complainant’s pre-trial detention was unduly prolonged beyond the statutory maximum, that repeated separation and committal orders were abused to circumvent legal limits, and that the right to defence and presumption of innocence were violated by both procedural actions and public statements by government officials. Remedies at the national level were found to be ineffective and unduly prolonged, exempting the Complainant from further exhaustion. The Commission concluded that Articles 6, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), and 7(1)(d) of the African Charter were violated.
- Citation
- mebara v cameroon communication 41612 2015 achpr 3 8 august 2015
- Parties
- Complainant: Jean-Marie Atangana Mebara; Respondent State: Republic of Cameroon
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; violations found
- Legal Topics
- Arbitrary Detention, Right to Fair Trial, Presumption of Innocence, Right to Defence, Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Compensation for Unlawful Detention
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jean-Marie Atangana Mebara
Complainant
Republic of Cameroon
Respondent State
Procedural Posture
Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Complainant's prolonged pre-trial detention and repeated indictments violated Articles 6 and 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
- 2 Whether the right to be presumed innocent, the right to defence, and the right to be tried within a reasonable time were violated
- 3 Whether the remedies available at the national level were effective, sufficient, and not unduly prolonged
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission found that the Complainant’s pre-trial detention was unduly prolonged beyond the statutory maximum, that repeated separation and committal orders were abused to circumvent legal limits, and that the right to defence and presumption of innocence were violated by both procedural actions and public statements by government officials. Remedies at the national level were found to be ineffective and unduly prolonged, exempting the Complainant from further exhaustion. The Commission concluded that Articles 6, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), and 7(1)(d) of the African Charter were violated.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; violations found
Orders
- Immediate release of the Complainant
- Sanctioning of all Government employees responsible for the violations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment