mebara v cameroon communication 41612 2015 achpr 3 8 august 2015

mebara v cameroon communication 41612 2015 achpr 3 8 august 2015

The Commission found that the Complainant’s pre-trial detention was unduly prolonged beyond the statutory maximum, that repeated separation and committal orders were abused to circumvent legal limits, and that the right to defence and presumption of innocence were violated by both procedural actions and public statements by government officials. Remedies at the national level were found to be ineffective and unduly prolonged, exempting the Complainant from further exhaustion. The Commission concluded that Articles 6, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), and 7(1)(d) of the African Charter were violated.

Citation
mebara v cameroon communication 41612 2015 achpr 3 8 august 2015
Parties
Complainant: Jean-Marie Atangana Mebara; Respondent State: Republic of Cameroon
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
8 August 2015
Procedural Posture
Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld; violations found
Legal Topics
Arbitrary Detention, Right to Fair Trial, Presumption of Innocence, Right to Defence, Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Compensation for Unlawful Detention
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean-Marie Atangana Mebara

Complainant

Republic of Cameroon

Respondent State

Procedural Posture

Communication (individual Complaint) Before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Merits Decision

  1. 1 Whether the Complainant's prolonged pre-trial detention and repeated indictments violated Articles 6 and 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
  2. 2 Whether the right to be presumed innocent, the right to defence, and the right to be tried within a reasonable time were violated
  3. 3 Whether the remedies available at the national level were effective, sufficient, and not unduly prolonged

Ratio Decidendi

The Commission found that the Complainant’s pre-trial detention was unduly prolonged beyond the statutory maximum, that repeated separation and committal orders were abused to circumvent legal limits, and that the right to defence and presumption of innocence were violated by both procedural actions and public statements by government officials. Remedies at the national level were found to be ineffective and unduly prolonged, exempting the Complainant from further exhaustion. The Commission concluded that Articles 6, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c), and 7(1)(d) of the African Charter were violated.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld; violations found

Orders

  • Immediate release of the Complainant
  • Sanctioning of all Government employees responsible for the violations