arbogast ruzagi vs wilibad rock 2021 tzhc 2963 29 april 2021
The application did not raise points of general importance nor did the applicant account for each day of delay or show illegality in the impugned decision; therefore, leave to appeal was not warranted.
- Citation
- arbogast ruzagi vs wilibad rock 2021 tzhc 2963 29 april 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Arbogast Ruzagi; Respondent: Wilbard Rock
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appellate Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Arbogast Ruzagi
Applicant
Wilbard Rock
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal raises points of general importance
- 2 Whether the applicant accounted for the delay in filing the appeal
- 3 Whether the impugned decision was tainted with illegality
Ratio Decidendi
The application did not raise points of general importance nor did the applicant account for each day of delay or show illegality in the impugned decision; therefore, leave to appeal was not warranted.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed without order for costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment