aron ulaya vs damian ulaya 1996 tzhc 21 23 april 1996
The substantive appeal was filed in the wrong court contrary to section 25(3) of the Magistrates Courts Act, 1984, rendering it incompetent; therefore, even if extension and review were allowed, the appeal would remain incompetent.
- Citation
- aron ulaya vs damian ulaya 1996 tzhc 21 23 april 1996
- Parties
- Applicant: Aron Ulaya; Respondent: Dakeani Plata
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aron Ulaya
Applicant
Dakeani Plata
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time to file application for review should be granted
- 2 Whether the original appeal was filed in the correct court
Ratio Decidendi
The substantive appeal was filed in the wrong court contrary to section 25(3) of the Magistrates Courts Act, 1984, rendering it incompetent; therefore, even if extension and review were allowed, the appeal would remain incompetent.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear their own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment