asa security service ltd vs rogatus nikata another 2016 tzhc 2231 21 april 2016

asa security service ltd vs rogatus nikata another 2016 tzhc 2231 21 april 2016

Applicant was duly served with third party notice and was aware of proceedings, as evidenced by filing a counter affidavit; failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not advance sufficient reasons for delay; application for extension of time dismissed.

Citation
asa security service ltd vs rogatus nikata another 2016 tzhc 2231 21 april 2016
Parties
Applicant: ASA Security Service Ltd; 1st Respondent: Rogatus Nikata; 2nd Respondent: Tanzania Revenue Authority
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Default Judgment, Service of Summons, Revision, Third Party Notice
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Default Judgment Service of Summons Revision Third Party Notice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ASA Security Service Ltd

Applicant

Rogatus Nikata

1st Respondent

Tanzania Revenue Authority

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant advanced sufficient reasons for extension of time to file revision
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was duly served and aware of trial court proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant was duly served with third party notice and was aware of proceedings, as evidenced by filing a counter affidavit; failed to comply with procedural requirements and did not advance sufficient reasons for delay; application for extension of time dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • application dismissed
  • costs awarded to respondents