asami nemoto and another vs alex david silaa and another 2021 tzhc 5770 24 august 2021
The applicants, as lawful administrators of the estates of deceased directors/shareholders, have locus standi. The court is not functus officio because the previous order was obtained through concealment of material facts and fraud. The court has inherent power to vacate its own orders to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice. The previous order is set aside, and the matter is remitted to be heard together with the related pending case.
- Citation
- asami nemoto and another vs alex david silaa and another 2021 tzhc 5770 24 august 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Asami Nemoto; Applicant: Abdallah Dickemla; Respondent: Alex David Silaa; Respondent: Japan Tanzania Tours Limited
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Main Application
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Functus Officio, Inherent Powers of Court, Joinder of Parties, Fraud on Court, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asami Nemoto
Applicant
Abdallah Dickemla
Applicant
Alex David Silaa
Respondent
Japan Tanzania Tours Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Main Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have locus standi to bring the application
- 2 Whether the court is functus officio regarding its previous order
- 3 Whether the previous order was obtained by fraud or concealment of material facts
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants, as lawful administrators of the estates of deceased directors/shareholders, have locus standi. The court is not functus officio because the previous order was obtained through concealment of material facts and fraud. The court has inherent power to vacate its own orders to prevent abuse of process and ensure justice. The previous order is set aside, and the matter is remitted to be heard together with the related pending case.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The ruling of this court made in Miscellaneous Civil Cause No. 57 of 2020 dated 26/11/2020 is declared to have been obtained illegally and is set aside.
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause No. 57 of 2020 is remitted to and shall form part of the proceedings in Miscellaneous Civil Cause No. 351 of 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment