asha hassan vs emmanuel magembe and 2 others 2020 tzhc 2430 31 july 2020
The 1st respondent's utterance of threatening words completed the offence under section 89(2) of the Penal Code; subsequent departure from the scene was immaterial. The lower courts' reasoning was legally and logically flawed, warranting interference and conviction.
- Citation
- asha hassan vs emmanuel magembe and 2 others 2020 tzhc 2430 31 july 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Asha Hassan; 1st Respondent: Emmanuel Magembe; 2nd Respondent: Dorica Sanjura; 3rd Respondent: Nyeseko Emmanuel
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; 1st respondent convicted and sentenced to community service; appeal dismissed against 2nd and 3rd respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Threatening to Kill, Community Service Sentencing, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asha Hassan
Appellant
Emmanuel Magembe
1st Respondent
Dorica Sanjura
2nd Respondent
Nyeseko Emmanuel
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents threatened to kill the appellant under section 89(2) of the Penal Code
- 2 Whether the lower courts erred in acquitting the respondents
Ratio Decidendi
The 1st respondent's utterance of threatening words completed the offence under section 89(2) of the Penal Code; subsequent departure from the scene was immaterial. The lower courts' reasoning was legally and logically flawed, warranting interference and conviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; 1st respondent convicted and sentenced to community service; appeal dismissed against 2nd and 3rd respondents.
Orders
- 1st respondent sentenced to six months community service under supervision of community service officer for Mara region.
- 2nd and 3rd respondents' acquittal confirmed; appeal dismissed against them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment