20190906 TZHC Mbeya
The appellant failed to prove that the signature and thumbprint on the spouse consent document were not hers. The evidence showed she signed the consent in the presence of a commissioner for oath. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence and facts, and the appeal lacks merit.
- Citation
- 20190906 TZHC Mbeya
- Parties
- Appellant: Asia Buchad Ismaeli; 1st Respondent: Msolopa Auction Mart; 2nd Respondent: Agricultural Input Trust Fund; 3rd Respondent: Buchad Mutakyawa
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Spousal Consent, Burden of Proof, Admissibility of Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Asia Buchad Ismaeli
Appellant
Msolopa Auction Mart
1st Respondent
Agricultural Input Trust Fund
2nd Respondent
Buchad Mutakyawa
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law and fact to hold that there was spouse consent
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to properly evaluate evidence
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the appellant's evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove that the signature and thumbprint on the spouse consent document were not hers. The evidence showed she signed the consent in the presence of a commissioner for oath. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence and facts, and the appeal lacks merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Right of appeal explained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment