athanas sebastian kapunga and 7 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4331 15 december 2020
Applicants are entitled to bail as the offences are bailable and the respondent did not oppose bail; however, statutory conditions under section 36(5) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act must be strictly applied due to the high monetary value involved. Health grounds were disregarded due to lack of admissible evidence.
- Citation
- athanas sebastian kapunga and 7 others vs r 2020 tzhc 4331 15 december 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Athanas Sebastian Kapunga; Applicant: Elizabeth Wahyde Munuo; Applicant: Samwel Lazaro Nhiga; Applicant: James Qwarda Jirojik; Applicant: Tumaini Exaud Msigwa; Applicant: Emily Maganga Lyotela; Applicant: Juma Rashid Idd; Applicant: Musa Zungiza Zungiza; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Economic and Organised Crime Control, Right to Bail, Evidentiary Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Athanas Sebastian Kapunga
Applicant
Elizabeth Wahyde Munuo
Applicant
Samwel Lazaro Nhiga
Applicant
James Qwarda Jirojik
Applicant
Tumaini Exaud Msigwa
Applicant
Emily Maganga Lyotela
Applicant
Juma Rashid Idd
Applicant
Musa Zungiza Zungiza
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial for economic crimes
- 2 Whether health status and other grounds justify bail
- 3 What conditions should be imposed for bail in economic offences
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants are entitled to bail as the offences are bailable and the respondent did not oppose bail; however, statutory conditions under section 36(5) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act must be strictly applied due to the high monetary value involved. Health grounds were disregarded due to lack of admissible evidence.
Court Disposition
Bail granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.
Orders
- 1st and 2nd applicants to each deposit T.shs. 840,105,902.75 or immovable property of equal value.
- 1st and 2nd applicants to each provide two sureties, each executing a bond of T.shs. 420,052,951.375, sureties to be residents within jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment