mary barnaba mushi vs attorney general 2023 tzhc 18309 14 june 2023
There is no confusion regarding the minimum age of marriage for a girl child, which is 18 years as declared by the Court of Appeal. The ongoing nationwide consultations by the executive are not the correct approach and undermine the judiciary's authority. Sections 13 and 17 of the Law of Marriage Act, having not been amended within the one-year period directed by the court, are redundant and no longer have legal effect. However, the court declined to make a declaration of contempt or halt the consultation exercise, instead directing the Attorney General to comply with the court decisions within six months.
- Citation
- mary barnaba mushi vs attorney general 2023 tzhc 18309 14 june 2023
- Parties
- Petitioner: Mary Barnaba Mushi; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause (originating Summons) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Minimum Age of Marriage, Judicial Authority, Separation of Powers, Contempt of Court, Legislative Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Barnaba Mushi
Petitioner
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause (originating Summons) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is confusion as to the minimum age of marriage for girl children after the High Court and Court of Appeal decisions
- 2 Whether ongoing nationwide consultations scrutinizing court decisions is a correct approach
- 3 Whether sections 13 and 17 of the Law of Marriage Act still exist in the statute books after the lapse of the one-year moratorium
Ratio Decidendi
There is no confusion regarding the minimum age of marriage for a girl child, which is 18 years as declared by the Court of Appeal. The ongoing nationwide consultations by the executive are not the correct approach and undermine the judiciary's authority. Sections 13 and 17 of the Law of Marriage Act, having not been amended within the one-year period directed by the court, are redundant and no longer have legal effect. However, the court declined to make a declaration of contempt or halt the consultation exercise, instead directing the Attorney General to comply with the court decisions within six months.
Court Disposition
Petition partly allowed
Orders
- Attorney General is directed to comply with the Court of Appeal and High Court decisions and amend the Law of Marriage Act within six months, removing the unconstitutional provisions from the Revised Edition of 2019.
- No declaration of contempt or order to halt the ongoing consultations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment