onesmo olengurumwa vs attorney general 2020 tzhc 4600 17 december 2020
Strict compliance with Section 6 of BRADEA is mandatory for constitutional petitions; failure to include all required contents renders the petition incompetent and subject to being struck out. Affidavits supporting petitions must not contain legal arguments or extraneous matters; offending paragraphs may be expunged if the remainder is sufficient. The determination of whether a petition is frivolous or vexatious generally requires substantive hearing and cannot be decided at the preliminary stage unless it is a pure point of law.
- Citation
- onesmo olengurumwa vs attorney general 2020 tzhc 4600 17 december 2020
- Parties
- Petitioner: Onesmo Olengurumwa; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause (constitutional Petition) / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
- Outcome
- Petition struck out
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Litigation, Constitutional Remedies, Separation of Powers, Procedural Compliance, Affidavit Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onesmo Olengurumwa
Petitioner
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause (constitutional Petition) / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Petition complies with Section 6 of the Basic Rights and Duties Enforcement Act (BRADEA) and is therefore competent
- 2 Whether the supporting Affidavit is incurably defective for containing extraneous matters contrary to Order XIX Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code
- 3 Whether the Petition is frivolous, vexatious, or offends Article 26(2) of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Strict compliance with Section 6 of BRADEA is mandatory for constitutional petitions; failure to include all required contents renders the petition incompetent and subject to being struck out. Affidavits supporting petitions must not contain legal arguments or extraneous matters; offending paragraphs may be expunged if the remainder is sufficient. The determination of whether a petition is frivolous or vexatious generally requires substantive hearing and cannot be decided at the preliminary stage unless it is a pure point of law.
Court Disposition
Petition struck out
Orders
- Petition struck out for non-compliance with Section 6 of BRADEA
- Paragraphs 4 and 7 of the supporting Affidavit expunged for containing extraneous matters
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment