attorney general vs mkongo building civil works contractors ltd another 2020 tzca 44 16 march 2020

attorney general vs mkongo building civil works contractors ltd another 2020 tzca 44 16 march 2020

The applicant accounted for the delay after becoming aware of the decree, acted diligently, and alleged serious illegalities in the arbitral award and registration; extension of time is warranted to allow revision.

Citation
attorney general vs mkongo building civil works contractors ltd another 2020 tzca 44 16 march 2020
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; 1st Respondent: Mkongo Building and Civil Works Contractors Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Namtumbo District Council
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality, Public Interest, Arbitral Award Registration
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Mkongo Building and Civil Works Contractors Ltd

1st Respondent

Namtumbo District Council

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time to apply for revision against the High Court decree registering the arbitral award
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegalities in the arbitral award and proceedings justify extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant accounted for the delay after becoming aware of the decree, acted diligently, and alleged serious illegalities in the arbitral award and registration; extension of time is warranted to allow revision.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted sixty days extension of time to apply for revision, reckoned from the date of delivery of this ruling.
  • Costs to abide by the outcome of the revision.