19950523 TZCA Dodoma
The constitutional amendment (Eleventh Amendment) to Article 21(1) of the Constitution rendered the appeal academic as it nullified the High Court's declaration on independent candidacy. The respondent failed to show personal harm from section 13 of the Newspapers Act, so the claim of unconstitutionality was dismissed. There is no constitutional or legal restriction preventing the President from appointing Zanzibaris to non-Union positions on the Mainland.
- Citation
- 19950523 TZCA Dodoma
- Parties
- Appellant: Attorney General; Respondent: Rev. Christopher Mtikila
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal withdrawn with costs to respondent; cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Stand as Independent Candidate, Freedom of Expression, Ministerial Powers Under Newspapers Act, Presidential Appointments, Separation of Powers
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Appellant
Rev. Christopher Mtikila
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the constitutional amendment nullifying independent candidacy rendered the appeal academic
- 2 Whether section 13 of the Newspapers Act is unconstitutional for violating freedom of expression
- 3 Whether the President can appoint Zanzibaris to non-Union positions on the Mainland
Ratio Decidendi
The constitutional amendment (Eleventh Amendment) to Article 21(1) of the Constitution rendered the appeal academic as it nullified the High Court's declaration on independent candidacy. The respondent failed to show personal harm from section 13 of the Newspapers Act, so the claim of unconstitutionality was dismissed. There is no constitutional or legal restriction preventing the President from appointing Zanzibaris to non-Union positions on the Mainland.
Court Disposition
Appeal withdrawn with costs to respondent; cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal marked withdrawn under rule 3(2)(a) and (c) of the Court of Appeal Rules, with costs to the respondent.
- Cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment