attorney general another vs yassin bashiri 2022 tzhcld 212 28 april 2022

attorney general another vs yassin bashiri 2022 tzhcld 212 28 april 2022

The application seeks to challenge an interlocutory order (condonation) which does not finally determine the rights of the parties. As per Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules and relevant case law, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain revision against such an order. Therefore, the application is dismissed.

Citation
attorney general another vs yassin bashiri 2022 tzhcld 212 28 april 2022
Parties
Applicant: Attorney General; Applicant: Board of Trustees of Public Services Social Security Fund; Respondent: Yassin Bashiri
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Interlocutory Orders, Jurisdiction, Condonation, Revision Proceedings
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Interlocutory Orders Jurisdiction Condonation Revision Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Applicant

Board of Trustees of Public Services Social Security Fund

Applicant

Yassin Bashiri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to file revision challenges an interlocutory order
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain revision against an interlocutory order of the CMA

Ratio Decidendi

The application seeks to challenge an interlocutory order (condonation) which does not finally determine the rights of the parties. As per Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules and relevant case law, the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain revision against such an order. Therefore, the application is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs