audax john vs almachius longino 2006 tzhc 300 17 may 2006

audax john vs almachius longino 2006 tzhc 300 17 may 2006

The appeal was filed outside the prescribed 30-day period without leave of the court; therefore, it is time-barred and must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
audax john vs almachius longino 2006 tzhc 300 17 may 2006
Parties
Appellant: Audax John; Respondent: Almachius Longino
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)
Outcome
appeal dismissed as time-barred
Legal Topics
Appeal Period, Limitation of Actions, Jurisdiction
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Procedural Law Appeal Period Limitation of Actions Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Audax John

Appellant

Almachius Longino

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
  2. 2 Whether the court can entertain an appeal filed out of time without leave

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed outside the prescribed 30-day period without leave of the court; therefore, it is time-barred and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as time-barred

Orders

  • appeal dismissed