mrema vs electoral commission and another 2005 tzhc 72 20 december 200

mrema vs electoral commission and another 2005 tzhc 72 20 december 200

The applicant failed to provide original evidence of alleged rigging and did not establish sufficient grounds for an interim injunction; the court found no justification to restrain the announcement of election results.

Citation
mrema vs electoral commission and another 2005 tzhc 72 20 december 200
Parties
Applicant: Augustine Lyatonga Mrema; 1st Respondent: Electoral Commission; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Ex Parte Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interim Injunction, Electoral Disputes, Vote Rigging Allegations
Source Language
English
Election Law Civil Procedure Interim Injunction Electoral Disputes Vote Rigging Allegations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Augustine Lyatonga Mrema

Applicant

Electoral Commission

1st Respondent

The Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Ex Parte Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should restrain the National Electoral Commission from announcing presidential election results pending investigation into alleged vote rigging

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide original evidence of alleged rigging and did not establish sufficient grounds for an interim injunction; the court found no justification to restrain the announcement of election results.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Chamber summons ex parte is dismissed.
  • If the Chairman of the National Electoral Commission has not yet announced the results, he should proceed to do so.