augostino yeromin vs republic 2018 tzhc 2582 15 october 2018
The application is incompetent because the supporting affidavit contains prayers, which is contrary to established legal principles regarding affidavits.
- Citation
- augostino yeromin vs republic 2018 tzhc 2582 15 october 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Augustino Yeromini; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Defective Affidavit, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Augustino Yeromini
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for extension of time is competent when supported by an affidavit containing prayers and extraneous matters
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent because the supporting affidavit contains prayers, which is contrary to established legal principles regarding affidavits.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The application is struck out for being supported by a defective affidavit containing prayers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment