austin nelson sikwese vs wintech elevators t ltd 2020 tzhcld 15 6 march 2020

Non-compliance with mandatory affidavit requirements under Rule 24(3)(a)(b)(d) of the Labour Court Rules renders the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.

Citation: austin nelson sikwese vs wintech elevators t ltd 2020 tzhcld 15 6 march 2020
Parties: Applicant: Austin Nelson Sikwese; Respondent: Wintech Elevators (T) Ltd
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 6 March 2020
Procedural Posture: Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: Application struck out for incompetence due to defective affidavit.
Legal Topics: Affidavit Requirements, Unfair Termination, Procedural Compliance
Source Language: English

Labour Law Affidavit Requirements Unfair Termination Procedural Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Austin Nelson Sikwese

Applicant

Wintech Elevators (T) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant's affidavit complies with Rule 24(3)(a)(b)(d) of the Labour Court Rules GN 106/2007
2 Whether non-compliance with affidavit requirements renders the application incompetent

Ratio Decidendi

Non-compliance with mandatory affidavit requirements under Rule 24(3)(a)(b)(d) of the Labour Court Rules renders the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out for incompetence due to defective affidavit.

Orders

Application is struck out for incompetence.