avija mathias another vs bashiri hassani 2007 tzhc 86 14 september 2007

avija mathias another vs bashiri hassani 2007 tzhc 86 14 september 2007

The High Court found that both the trial and first appellate courts properly evaluated the evidence and that the charge against the appellants was proved beyond reasonable doubt, with no point of law warranting interference.

Citation
avija mathias another vs bashiri hassani 2007 tzhc 86 14 september 2007
Parties
Appellant: Avija Mathias; Appellant: Fredom Endeni J; Respondent: Bashiri Hassani
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 September 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Malicious Damage to Property, Standard of Proof, Appellate Review
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Avija Mathias

Appellant

Fredom Endeni J

Appellant

Bashiri Hassani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)

  1. 1 Whether the District Court erred in law and fact in dismissing the appeal without any point of law
  2. 2 Whether the conviction for malicious damage to property was supported by sufficient evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that both the trial and first appellate courts properly evaluated the evidence and that the charge against the appellants was proved beyond reasonable doubt, with no point of law warranting interference.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Decision of the lower courts upheld
  • Right of appeal explained