avitus
Applicant is entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, the application is uncontested, and no compelling reasons exist to deny bail. The bail deposit must be shared among all accused as per established legal principle.
- Citation
- avitus
- Parties
- Applicant: Avitus Winchlaus@Dany; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Economic Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Bail granted to applicant pending trial
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Jurisdiction, Organized Crime, Property Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avitus Winchlaus@Dany
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Economic Application / Bail Application Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending trial given the value of the subject matter exceeds the Resident Magistrate's jurisdiction
- 2 Whether the offence is bailable under Tanzanian law
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant is entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, the application is uncontested, and no compelling reasons exist to deny bail. The bail deposit must be shared among all accused as per established legal principle.
Court Disposition
Bail granted to applicant pending trial
Orders
- Applicant to deposit cash TZS 14,500,000 or immovable property of equivalent value with valuation report from Government Valuer
- Applicant must have two reliable sureties with national identity cards and introduction letters from local authority
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment