ex parte avocats sans frontieres appeal 1 of 2022 2023 eacj 4 24 february 2023
The Appellate Division lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the Principal Judge sitting as a single judge on an amicus curiae application; the proper remedy is to seek review by the full court of the First Instance Division under Rule 69(3).
- Citation
- ex parte avocats sans frontieres appeal 1 of 2022 2023 eacj 4 24 february 2023
- Parties
- Appellant: Avocats Sans Frontiere
- Court
- EACJ
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Amicus Curiae, Jurisdiction, Appellate Procedure, East African Community Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avocats Sans Frontiere
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellate Division has jurisdiction to hear the appeal against the decision of the Principal Judge denying leave to appear as amicus curiae
- 2 Whether the procedure for admitting amicus curiae contravenes the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellate Division lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a decision of the Principal Judge sitting as a single judge on an amicus curiae application; the proper remedy is to seek review by the full court of the First Instance Division under Rule 69(3).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction of the Appellate Division.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment