ayoub bendera others vs arusha international conference center 2012 tzca 144 18 september 2012

ayoub bendera others vs arusha international conference center 2012 tzca 144 18 september 2012

The application was withdrawn because the matter it concerned had already been determined, and there was no objection from the respondent.

Citation
ayoub bendera others vs arusha international conference center 2012 tzca 144 18 september 2012
Parties
Applicant: Ayoub Bendera; Applicant: Genefeva J. Sizya; Applicant: William Kuppa; Applicant: Chia Massonga; Applicant: Oliva P. Mudogo; Applicant: Masselle J. Bushububili; Applicant: Hemed Shoko; Applicant: Anitha Lyimo; Applicant: Marco G. Emay; Applicant: Ahmad Mmuni; Applicant: Zulpha Mhina; Applicant: Monica Mathew; Respondent: Arusha International Conference Centre
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Withdrawal Before Hearing
Outcome
application withdrawn
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Court Procedure
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ayoub Bendera

Applicant

Genefeva J. Sizya

Applicant

William Kuppa

Applicant

Chia Massonga

Applicant

Oliva P. Mudogo

Applicant

Masselle J. Bushububili

Applicant

Hemed Shoko

Applicant

Anitha Lyimo

Applicant

Marco G. Emay

Applicant

Ahmad Mmuni

Applicant

Zulpha Mhina

Applicant

Monica Mathew

Applicant

Arusha International Conference Centre

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Withdrawal Before Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the application should be withdrawn as prayed by the applicants

Ratio Decidendi

The application was withdrawn because the matter it concerned had already been determined, and there was no objection from the respondent.

Court Disposition

application withdrawn

Orders

  • Application withdrawn under Rule 58(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
  • No order as to costs